Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Antigen-loaded monocyte administration induces potent therapeutic antitumor T cell responses
Min-Nung Huang, … , John H. Sampson, Michael D. Gunn
Min-Nung Huang, … , John H. Sampson, Michael D. Gunn
Published October 29, 2019
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2020;130(2):774-788. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI128267.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology

Antigen-loaded monocyte administration induces potent therapeutic antitumor T cell responses

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Efficacy of dendritic cell (DC) cancer vaccines is classically thought to depend on their antigen-presenting cell (APC) activity. Studies show, however, that DC vaccine priming of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) requires the activity of endogenous DCs, suggesting that exogenous DCs stimulate antitumor immunity by transferring antigens (Ags) to endogenous DCs. Such Ag transfer functions are most commonly ascribed to monocytes, implying that undifferentiated monocytes would function equally well as a vaccine modality and need not be differentiated to DCs to be effective. Here, we used several murine cancer models to test the antitumor efficacy of undifferentiated monocytes loaded with protein or peptide Ag. Intravenously injected monocytes displayed antitumor activity superior to DC vaccines in several cancer models, including aggressive intracranial glioblastoma. Ag-loaded monocytes induced robust CTL responses via Ag transfer to splenic CD8+ DCs in a manner independent of monocyte APC activity. Ag transfer required cell-cell contact and the formation of connexin 43–containing gap junctions between monocytes and DCs. These findings demonstrate the existence of an efficient gap junction–mediated Ag transfer pathway between monocytes and CD8+ DCs and suggest that administration of tumor Ag–loaded undifferentiated monocytes may serve as a simple and efficacious immunotherapy for the treatment of human cancers.

Authors

Min-Nung Huang, Lowell T. Nicholson, Kristen A. Batich, Adam M. Swartz, David Kopin, Sebastian Wellford, Vijay K. Prabhakar, Karolina Woroniecka, Smita K. Nair, Peter E. Fecci, John H. Sampson, Michael D. Gunn

×

Figure 7

Monocytes transfer Ag to splenic cDCs via gap junctions to prime CD8+ T cells.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Monocytes transfer Ag to splenic cDCs via gap junctions to prime CD8+ T ...
(A–C) CD45.2 OVA-monocytes were IV injected into CD45.1 mice 16 hours before the spleen harvest for immunofluorescent staining. (A) Distribution of Cx43 in the spleen. Cx43 negative control (ctrl): normal rabbit IgG + Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG. WP: white pulp; RP: red pulp. Scale bars: 100 μm (left), 50 μm (right). (B) Presence of Cx43 on OVA-monocytes and splenic cDCs. Scale bar: 10 μm. (C) The inset of B (scale bar: 4 μm) and its derived 3D reconstruction (scale bar: 2 μm) showing Cx43 at the monocyte-cDC interface (white arrows). (D) Representative dot plots showing proliferation of CFSE-labeled OT-I cells cultured with OVA-loaded MHCI-deficient monocytes and splenic cDCs in the presence of a Cx43 inhibitory peptide (Gap27), the scrambled Gap27 peptide, or a nonspecific gap junction inhibitor, carbenoxolone. No tx, no treatment. (E) The scatter plot derived from D. The percentages of proliferating CFSE-labeled OT-I cells were normalized to the mean percentage of the no treatment group. Cbx, carbenoxolone. ****P < 0.0001 (1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test). (F) Representative dot plots showing frequency of OVA-specific CD8+ T cells among total CD8+ T cells in spleens of mice with Cx43-intact (Gja1fl/fl) or -deficient splenic cDCs (CD11c-Cre Gja1fl/fl) on day 7 after IV OVA-monocyte injection. (G) Scatter plots of the frequencies and cell numbers of OVA-specific CD8+ T cells derived from F. ***P < 0.001 (unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test). Data represent mean ± SEM.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts