Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
PARP inhibition enhances tumor cell–intrinsic immunity in ERCC1-deficient non–small cell lung cancer
Roman M. Chabanon, Gareth Muirhead, Dragomir B. Krastev, Julien Adam, Daphné Morel, Marlène Garrido, Andrew Lamb, Clémence Hénon, Nicolas Dorvault, Mathieu Rouanne, Rebecca Marlow, Ilirjana Bajrami, Marta Llorca Cardeñosa, Asha Konde, Benjamin Besse, Alan Ashworth, Stephen J. Pettitt, Syed Haider, Aurélien Marabelle, Andrew N.J. Tutt, Jean-Charles Soria, Christopher J. Lord, Sophie Postel-Vinay
Roman M. Chabanon, Gareth Muirhead, Dragomir B. Krastev, Julien Adam, Daphné Morel, Marlène Garrido, Andrew Lamb, Clémence Hénon, Nicolas Dorvault, Mathieu Rouanne, Rebecca Marlow, Ilirjana Bajrami, Marta Llorca Cardeñosa, Asha Konde, Benjamin Besse, Alan Ashworth, Stephen J. Pettitt, Syed Haider, Aurélien Marabelle, Andrew N.J. Tutt, Jean-Charles Soria, Christopher J. Lord, Sophie Postel-Vinay
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

PARP inhibition enhances tumor cell–intrinsic immunity in ERCC1-deficient non–small cell lung cancer

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The cyclic GMP-AMP synthase/stimulator of IFN genes (cGAS/STING) pathway detects cytosolic DNA to activate innate immune responses. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) selectively target cancer cells with DNA repair deficiencies such as those caused by BRCA1 mutations or ERCC1 defects. Using isogenic cell lines and patient-derived samples, we showed that ERCC1-defective non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells exhibit an enhanced type I IFN transcriptomic signature and that low ERCC1 expression correlates with increased lymphocytic infiltration. We demonstrated that clinical PARPi, including olaparib and rucaparib, have cell-autonomous immunomodulatory properties in ERCC1-defective NSCLC and BRCA1-defective triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells. Mechanistically, PARPi generated cytoplasmic chromatin fragments with characteristics of micronuclei; these were found to activate cGAS/STING, downstream type I IFN signaling, and CCL5 secretion. Importantly, these effects were suppressed in PARP1-null TNBC cells, suggesting that this phenotype resulted from an on-target effect of PARPi on PARP1. PARPi also potentiated IFN-γ–induced PD-L1 expression in NSCLC cell lines and in fresh patient tumor cells; this effect was enhanced in ERCC1-deficient contexts. Our data provide a preclinical rationale for using PARPi as immunomodulatory agents in appropriately molecularly selected populations.

Authors

Roman M. Chabanon, Gareth Muirhead, Dragomir B. Krastev, Julien Adam, Daphné Morel, Marlène Garrido, Andrew Lamb, Clémence Hénon, Nicolas Dorvault, Mathieu Rouanne, Rebecca Marlow, Ilirjana Bajrami, Marta Llorca Cardeñosa, Asha Konde, Benjamin Besse, Alan Ashworth, Stephen J. Pettitt, Syed Haider, Aurélien Marabelle, Andrew N.J. Tutt, Jean-Charles Soria, Christopher J. Lord, Sophie Postel-Vinay

×

Figure 5

PARPi-induced CCFs are detected by cGAS.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
PARPi-induced CCFs are detected by cGAS.
(A) Representative immunofluore...
(A) Representative immunofluorescence images of DMSO-, Ruca-, and Ola-exposed A549-ERCC1WT/WT and A549-ERCC1–/– cells. Cells were exposed to 15 μM Ruca or 40 μM Ola during 72 hours. White arrows, CCFs; yellow arrows, micronuclei. Scale bars: 20 μm. Images corresponding to the DMSO condition originate from the same image field as those shown in Figure 3B. (B) Automated quantification of cytoplasmic cGAS foci in A549-ERCC1 isogenic cells exposed to increasing doses of Ruca or Ola (μM). Shown are numbers of cytoplasmic cGAS foci per cell normalized to DMSO. Mean ± SD, n = 3, Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc Dunn’s test, relative to DMSO control. Results shown are representative of 2 experiments performed with similar results. (C) Representative immunofluorescence images of DMSO-, Ruca-, and Ola-exposed SUM149-BRCA1mut and SUM149-PARP1–/– cells. Cells were exposed to 6 μM Ruca, 10 μM Ola, or DMSO (vehicle) during 72 hours. White arrows, CCFs; yellow arrows, micronuclei. Scale bars: 20 μm. (D) Automated quantification of cytoplasmic cGAS foci in SUM149-BRCA1mut, SUM149-BRCA1rev, and SUM149-PARP1–/– cells exposed to increasing doses of Ruca or Ola (μM). Shown are numbers of cytoplasmic cGAS foci per cell normalized to DMSO. Mean ± SD, n = 3; Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc Dunn’s test, relative to DMSO control. Results shown are representative of 2 experiments performed, with similar results. (E) Scatter box plots displaying cGAS foci intensity for each colocalizing CCF foci in A549-ERCC1WT/WT and A549-ERCC1–/– cells exposed to DMSO (vehicle), 15 μM Ruca, or 40 μM Ola. n = 3, Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc Dunn’s test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts