Advertisement
Commentary Free access | 10.1172/JCI11919
Department of Pathology, NB6.412, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, Texas 75390-9072, USA.
Phone: (214) 648-4121; Fax: (214) 648-4070; E-mail: siegelman@utsw.swmed.edu.
Find articles by Siegelman, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Published January 15, 2001 - More info
Over the past decade, it has become clear that the specificity and targeted regulation of leukocyte trafficking result from the sequential and frequently overlapping functions of various adhesive receptors. Adhesion between the leukocyte and the vessel wall begins with repeated transient interactions that allow the leukocyte to “roll” across the endothelium at a rate lower than that of blood flow. Rolling is attributed to the interaction between carbohydrate ligands and either members of the selectin family (1, 2) or CD44 (3, 4) and is followed by firm adhesion mediated by receptors of a different class, the leukocyte integrins. These integrins require activation-induced avidity increases to bind their ligands, generally members of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily.
The primary relevant integrins expressed by leukocytes contain either α4 (the heterodimers α4β1 and α4β7) or β2, also known as CD18, which heterodimerizes with any of four distinct α chains to form LFA-1, Mac-1, p150,95, and αdβ2 (5). The combination of adhesion receptor expression and microenvironmental influences encountered by leukocytes as they traverse the endothelium controls integrin activation and determines the leukocyte subsets recruited to a particular site and the kinetics with which this recruitment occurs. Loss of any of the adhesion molecules in this scheme could result in reduced extravasation of particular leukocyte subsets at sites of inflammation. Early studies of leukocyte adhesion molecule deficiency 1 disease (LADI), a genetic deficiency in which affected patients are subject to recurrent bacterial and fungal infections and have impaired wound healing, showed mutations in CD18. It is perhaps fitting that the manuscript by Forlow et al. in a recent issue of the JCI (6) focuses in part on the same molecule.
Mice lacking all three selectins, the β2 integrins, ICAM-1, or various combinations of these adhesion receptors have been generated with varying outcomes in induced inflammatory models, but generally these strains remain healthy under standard laboratory conditions (7, 8). The earliest indication of a spontaneous inflammatory defect resulting from adhesion receptor gene targeting was seen in mice doubly deficient for E- and P-selectin. Similar to the phenotype reported in the present study, the abnormalities in these mice consist primarily of excoriative skin lesions associated with bacterial colonization in the head and neck (9, 10). Rolling interactions are severely compromised in E/P-selectin–deficient mice, which fail to induce normal inflammatory responses to peritoneal infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae. These studies clearly established rolling as a prerequisite for firm adhesion. The second instance of a spontaneous and severe inflammatory condition was identified in CD18-deficient mice, again consisting primarily of mucocutaneous lesions (11). Nearly all mice of this genotype develop a similar progressive ulcerative dermatitis and are highly susceptible to inoculated S. pneumoniae. Intravital microscopy revealed that firm adhesion but not rolling is markedly impaired in these mice.
The primary impetus for the current study by Forlow et al. (6) was the observation that leukocyte rolling velocities are markedly increased in CD18-deficient mice, suggesting a previously unsuspected role for β2 integrins in mediating the initial phase of adhesion. The addition of anti–E-selectin antibody further increases rolling velocities and markedly decreases leukocyte stable adherence and recruitment. These findings reinforce the view that rolling velocity regulates the efficiency of leukocyte recruitment into infected tissues (12), but they hint at an unexpected collaboration between two receptors thought to participate in independent stages of this process. In view of the present data and those in several other studies (13–15), the paradigm of separate sequential steps of leukocyte extravasation may have to yield to an alternative model involving overlapping and collaborative roles for the various adhesive receptors.
Still more surprising is the markedly reduced viability of the E-selectin/CD18 double-mutant mice and the severity of their phenotype. Mutant animals fail to thrive and are severely runted. Animals surviving to 6 weeks of age develop mucocutaneous skin lesions morphologically similar to those of E/P-selectin double and CD18 single mutants (9–11). Because of the animals’ abbreviated lifespan, Forlow et al. recreated the double-mutant system in adults, conducting their intravital microscopy studies in E-selectin mutant mice reconstituted with bone marrow from CD18 mutant mice (6). Even so, fully one-half of animals did not survive appreciably beyond transplantation. The survivors were unhealthy and recapitulated the chronic ulcerative dermatitis seen in the original double mutants. The specificity of this severe phenotype is all the more remarkable considering that P-selectin/CD18–null mice are indistinguishable grossly from wild-type, survive to adulthood, and breed successfully. Why the selective cooperation between CD18 and E- but not P-selectin? Since E-selectin is generally considered more important in slow rolling, this phenotypic difference may point to a juncture, perhaps immediately prior to the commitment to firm adhesion, at which E-selectin is uniquely required. Such an E-selectin–dependent step may represent an essential transition phase in extravasation, indeed one more critical than that established by endothelial selectin knockouts.
The extreme impact on viability is remarkable and unexplained. Heterozygous matings result in expected mendelian ratios of offspring, suggesting no gross in utero developmental problems (6). Hematopoietic abnormalities and splenomegaly do not appear markedly different from some other adhesion molecule–deficient animals and are therefore unlikely to account for the early lethality. The most likely candidate in this respect would be infectious. Bacterial cultures of blood and other tissues were negative, but a potential viral or fungal etiology was not excluded; nor was a metabolic derangement addressed (6).
Could there be another vital requirement for a constitutive basal level of leukocyte infiltration into tissues? There is no precedent for such an explanation, but then no gene deficiency before has resulted in such a profound leukocyte infiltration defect. Still, this defect is not absolute, since Forlow et al. noted a mild lymphocytic and neutrophilic infiltrate in skin lesions in the double mutants (6). Moreover, although bacterial pneumonia was not evident, the animals show an increased neutrophilic infiltration in the lung, suggesting that alternative adhesive pathways operate in this organ (16, 17). Although the unique severity of the phenotype is clear, other comparisons to prior knockouts are more difficult. Common models of induced cutaneous, lung, or peritoneal inflammation have yet to be evaluated and may be informative in further defining the nature and extent of the inflammatory defect, and perhaps in providing insight into early mortality. Nonetheless, the study (6) clearly indicates that the various adhesion receptors contribute in a continuous manner to extravasation. In particular, it suggests that collaboration between these two adhesion receptors is essential, not compensated by other mechanisms, and defines a unique and critical juncture in the adhesion cascade.