Usage Information

Preferential influx and decreased fractional loss of lipoprotein(a) in atherosclerotic compared with nonlesioned rabbit aorta.
L B Nielsen, … , M Jauhiainen, B G Nordestgaard
L B Nielsen, … , M Jauhiainen, B G Nordestgaard
Published July 15, 1996
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1996;98(2):563-571. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI118824.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

Preferential influx and decreased fractional loss of lipoprotein(a) in atherosclerotic compared with nonlesioned rabbit aorta.

Abstract

The aim was to investigate the atherogenic potential of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and to further our understanding of the atherogenic process by measuring rates of transfer into the intima-inner media (i.e., intimal clearance) and rates of loss from the intima-inner media (i.e., fractional loss) of Lp(a) and LDL using cholesterol-fed rabbits with nonlesioned (n = 13) or atherosclerotic aortas (n = 12). In each rabbit, 131I-Lp(a) (or 131I-LDL) was injected intravenously 26 h before and 125I-Lp(a) (or 125I-LDL) 3 h before the aorta was removed and divided into six consecutive segments of similar size. The intimal clearance of Lp(a) and LDL was similar and markedly increased in atherosclerotic compared with nonlesioned aortas (ANOVA, effect of atherosclerosis: P < 0.0001). Fractional losses of labeled Lp(a) and labeled LDL in atherosclerotic aorta were on average 25 and 43%, respectively, of that in nonlesioned aortas (ANOVA, effect of atherosclerosis: P < 0.0001). Fractional loss of Lp(a) was 73% of that of LDL (ANOVA, effect of type of lipoprotein: P = 0.07). These data suggest that the development of atherosclerosis is associated with increased influx as well as decreased fractional loss of Lp(a) and LDL from the intima. Accordingly, Lp(a) may share with LDL the potential for causing atherosclerosis.

Authors

L B Nielsen, S Stender, M Jauhiainen, B G Nordestgaard

×

Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 134 10
PDF 48 17
Citation downloads 55 0
Totals 237 27
Total Views 264
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement