Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

Evidence that the fibrinogen binding domain of Apo(a) is outside the lysine binding site of kringle IV-10: a study involving naturally occurring lysine binding defective lipoprotein(a) phenotypes.
O Klezovitch, … , C Edelstein, A M Scanu
O Klezovitch, … , C Edelstein, A M Scanu
Published July 1, 1996
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1996;98(1):185-191. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI118765.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

Evidence that the fibrinogen binding domain of Apo(a) is outside the lysine binding site of kringle IV-10: a study involving naturally occurring lysine binding defective lipoprotein(a) phenotypes.

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

It is now established that the lysine binding site (LBS) of apo(a) kringle IV-10, and particularly Trp72, plays a dominant role in the binding of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] to lysine. To determine the role of the LBS in the binding of Lp(a) to fibrinogen, we examined the binding to plasmin-modified (PM) fibrinogen of human and rhesus monkey Lp(a) species classified as either Lys' or Lys- based on their capacity to bind lysine Sepharose and to have Trp or Arg, respectively, in position 72 of the LBS of kringle IV-10. We also examined the free apo(a)s obtained by subjecting their corresponding parent Lp(a)s to a mild reductive procedure developed in our laboratory. Our results show that both Lyst and Lys- Lp(a)s and their derived apo(a)s, bound to PM-fibrinogen with similar affinities (Kds: 33-100 nM), whereas the B(max) values were threefold higher for apo(a)s. Both the lysine analog epsilon-aminocaproic acid and L-proline inhibited the binding of Lp(a) and apo(a) to PM fibrinogen. We conclude that the LBS of kringle IV-10 is not involved in this process and that apo(a) binds to PM-fibrinogen via a lysine-proline-sensitive domain located outside the LBS and largely masked by the interaction of apo(a) with apoB100. The significant difference in the PM fibrinogen binding capacity also suggests that apo(a) may have a comparatively higher athero-thrombogenic potential than parent Lp(a).

Authors

O Klezovitch, C Edelstein, A M Scanu

×

Usage data is cumulative from June 2024 through June 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 104 25
PDF 54 18
Citation downloads 57 0
Totals 215 43
Total Views 258
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts