Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

High avidity IFN-neutralizing antibodies in pharmaceutically prepared human IgG.
C Ross, … , G L Vejlsgaard, K Bendtzen
C Ross, … , G L Vejlsgaard, K Bendtzen
Published May 1, 1995
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1995;95(5):1974-1978. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI117881.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

High avidity IFN-neutralizing antibodies in pharmaceutically prepared human IgG.

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

This paper demonstrates and characterizes naturally occurring antibodies to interferon (IFN) in human IgG preparations. In vitro neutralization of the antiviral effect of IFN alpha and IFN beta, but not IFN gamma, was observed in 12 of 15 normal IgG preparations. The neutralizing capacity was higher against rIFN alpha 2A and rIFN alpha 2C than against lymphoblastoid IFN alpha and IFN beta. Frühsommer meningoencephalitis hyperimmune IgG and hepatitis-B hyperimmune IgG showed potent neutralization, whereas anti-rhesus D-, anti-rabies-, and anti-tetanus IgG showed weak neutralization. Saturable binding of 125I-rIFN alpha 2A was demonstrated only in those IgG preparations found to neutralize the antiviral effect of IFN. Significant correlation between IFN binding and neutralization capacity was observed. The antibodies bound with Fab to rIFN alpha 2A with an avidity of approximately 30 pM; the majority was of the IgG1 subclass. Maximum binding capacity was 490 pg rIFN alpha 2A/mg IgG. Cross-binding of rIFN alpha 2C, lyIFN alpha N1 and IFN beta occurred with 10 and 100-200 times lower activities than that of rIFN alpha 2A. There was no cross-binding with rIFN gamma or rIL-6. IgG preparations containing anti-IFN antibodies blocked the binding of 125I-rIFN alpha 2A to A549 cells. In conclusion, pharmaceutically prepared human IgG preparations contain variable but significant levels of high-avidity IFN alpha and IFN beta neutralizing antibodies.

Authors

C Ross, M Svenson, M B Hansen, G L Vejlsgaard, K Bendtzen

×

Usage data is cumulative from November 2024 through November 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 193 13
PDF 73 10
Scanned page 169 4
Citation downloads 62 0
Totals 497 27
Total Views 524
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts