Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

Use of 2H2O for estimating rates of gluconeogenesis. Application to the fasted state.
B R Landau, … , K Ekberg, S C Kalhan
B R Landau, … , K Ekberg, S C Kalhan
Published January 1, 1995
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1995;95(1):172-178. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI117635.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

Use of 2H2O for estimating rates of gluconeogenesis. Application to the fasted state.

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

A method is introduced for estimating the contribution of gluconeogenesis to glucose production. 2H2O is administered orally to achieve 0.5% deuterium enrichment in body water. Enrichments are determined in the hydrogens bound to carbons 2 and 6 of blood glucose and in urinary water. Enrichment at carbon 6 of glucose is assayed in hexamethylenetetramine, formed from formaldehyde produced by periodate oxidation of the glucose. Enrichment at carbon 2 is assayed in lactate formed by enzymatic transfer of the hydrogen from glucose via sorbitol to pyruvate. The fraction gluconeogenesis contributes to glucose production equals the ratio of the enrichment at carbon 6 to that at carbon 2 or in urinary water. Applying the method, the contribution of gluconeogenesis in healthy subjects was 23-42% after fasting 14 h, increasing to 59-84% after fasting 42 h. Enrichment at carbon 2 to that in urinary water was 1.12 +/- 0.13. Therefore, the assumption that hydrogen equilibrated during hexose-6-P isomerization was fulfilled. The 3H/14C ratio in glucose formed from [3-3H,3-14C]lactate given to healthy subjects was 0.1 to 0.2 of that in the lactate. Therefore equilibration during gluconeogenesis of the hydrogen bound to carbon 6 with that in body water was 80-90% complete, so that gluconeogenesis is underestimated by 10-20%. Glycerol's contribution to gluconeogenesis is not included in these estimates. The method is applicable to studies in humans of gluconeogenesis at safe doses of 2H2O.

Authors

B R Landau, J Wahren, V Chandramouli, W C Schumann, K Ekberg, S C Kalhan

×

Usage data is cumulative from July 2024 through July 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 331 39
PDF 71 64
Figure 0 1
Scanned page 333 11
Citation downloads 82 0
Totals 817 115
Total Views 932
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts