We investigated a common polymorphism in the human apolipoprotein A-I gene promoter at a position 76 bp upstream of the transcriptional start site. 54 human subjects, whose apoAI production rates had been determined by apoAI turnover studies, were genotyped at this polymorphic position by a novel technique using polymerase chain reaction followed by primer extension. 35 subjects were homozygous for a guanosine (G) at this locus and 19 were heterozygous with a guanosine and adenosine (A). The apoAI production rates were significantly lower (by 11%) in the G/A heterozygotes than in the G homozygotes (P = 0.025). In spite of the apparent effect of this apoAI gene promoter polymorphism on the apoAI production rate, there was no effect on HDL cholesterol or apoAI levels. To investigate whether the observed difference in apoAI production rates was related to differential gene expression of the two alleles, promoters containing either allele were linked to the reporter gene chloramphenicol acetyltransferase, and relative promoter efficiencies were determined after transfection into the human HepG2 hepatoma cell line. The A allele expressed only 68% +/- 5% as well as the G allele, a result consistent with the in vivo apoAI production rate data.
J D Smith, E A Brinton, J L Breslow
Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 131 | 0 |
51 | 9 | |
Scanned page | 186 | 1 |
Citation downloads | 64 | 0 |
Totals | 432 | 10 |
Total Views | 442 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.