Infusion of adenosine (0.022-2.2 mg/min) into the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery of 26 patients produced a dose-dependent increase in blood pressure without a change in heart rate. At adenosine 2.2 mg/min, systolic pressure rose by 21.0 +/- 2.2 mmHg from 134 +/- 4.3 mmHg (P less than 0.001) and diastolic pressure increased by 10.4 +/- 1.1 mmHg from 76 +/- 1.9 mmHg (P less than 0.001). The rise in arterial pressure was associated with a 22 +/- 3.4% increase in systemic vascular resistance (P less than 0.01) and no change in cardiac output (-2.8 +/- 4.3%, P = NS). Plasma norepinephrine levels rose by 40 +/- 14% from 105 +/- 9 pg/ml (P less than 0.05) and epinephrine levels by 119 +/- 31% from 37 +/- 9 pg/ml (P less than 0.01). Right atrial infusion of adenosine produced insignificant hemodynamic effects, suggesting that systemic spillover of adenosine was not responsible for the observed effects. In 20 cardiac transplant patients with denervated hearts, LAD infusion of adenosine (2.2 mg/min) produced no change in systolic pressure (-0.1 +/- 1.6 mmHg from 139 +/- 3.4 mmHg, P = NS) and a decrement in diastolic pressure (-4.7 +/- 1.2 mmHg from 98 +/- 2.5 mmHg, P less than 0.01). Thus, infusion of adenosine into the LAD coronary artery causes a reflex increase in arterial pressure due to a rise in systemic vascular resistance, probably as a result of increased sympathetic discharge. This reflex pathway may be of importance in disease states such as myocardial ischemia, in which myocardial adenosine levels are elevated.
D A Cox, J A Vita, C B Treasure, R D Fish, A P Selwyn, P Ganz
Usage data is cumulative from June 2021 through June 2022.
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.