Usage Information
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1988;82(4):1306-1312. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI113731.
Abstract
From patients with untreated Graves' disease 11 sera showing high cAMP release in the FRTL-5 cell assay were studied for relative proportions of kappa or lambda Ig molecules showing cAMP releasing activity. Immunoabsorption of gamma-globulins was performed using monoclonal murine anti-kappa or anti-lambda antibodies linked to cyanogen bromide-activated sepharose. Specific kappa- or lambda-adsorbed fractions were also eluted from immunoabsorbents using chaotrophic thiocyanate buffers and equilibrated with pH 7.4 low salt buffer by dialysis. Immunoabsorption and elution experiments showed that five Graves' sera contained predominant cAMP-releasing activity within lambda Ig fractions, whereas two Graves' sera showed predominant cAMP-releasing activity in kappa Ig fractions. Four sera showed cAMP release approximately equally divided between kappa and lambda Ig both after immunoabsorption and specific anti-kappa or anti-lambda eluates were studied. C lambda genotypes were examined by Southern blotting and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of Eco RI-digested genomic DNA from 158 patients with Graves' disease in parallel with 112 normal controls and 29 patients with autoimmune hypothyroidism. Notable shifts in proportions of 8/8 and 18/18 genotypes were present when Graves' patients were compared with normal controls. Allelic frequencies and ratios of genotype 8 to 18 were significantly different (P less than 0.05) when Graves' patients were compared either to normal controls or to patients with autoimmune hypothyroidism.
Authors
R C Williams Jr, N J Marshall, K Kilpatrick, J Montano, P M Brickell, M Goodall, P A Ealey, B Shine, A P Weetman, R K Craig
Usage data is cumulative from September 2024 through September 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 81 | 46 |
| 34 | 13 | |
| Scanned page | 124 | 1 |
| Citation downloads | 28 | 0 |
| Totals | 267 | 60 |
| Total Views | 327 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)