An apparent increase of calmodulin (CaM) activity was previously observed in the heart and kidney but not in the liver of spontaneously-hypertensive rats (SHR) and mice compared with their corresponding normotensive controls. As this change was due to an elevated recovery of CaM in the organs of the hypertensive animals, the present study was designed to evaluate its activity in hypertension. A CaM activator, detected in heart and kidney supernatants from hypertensive animals, was found to be responsible for this enhanced recovery. Similar results were obtained with passaged, cultured aortic smooth muscle cells from SHR, indicating that the anomaly was not a mere consequence of elevated blood pressure but rather a genetic expression of cells of hypertensive origin. The activator was heat stable, nondialyzable, and recovered in the fraction precipitated with 30-50% ammonium sulfate. Preliminary extraction studies suggest that the activator is contained in a glycolipid fraction. The stimulation of phosphodiesterase by this activator was calcium and CaM dependent. The activator appears to affect the affinity of the phosphodiesterase for CaM rather than the maximal stimulation. The activator was also present at a low concentration in the heart and kidney of normotensive animals. These findings indicate that at least some of the calcium abnormalities implicated in the pathogenesis of hypertension could be the result of interactions between CaM, calcium, and this activator.
S L Huang, Y I Wen, D B Kupranycz, S C Pang, G Schlager, P Hamet, J Tremblay
Usage data is cumulative from August 2024 through August 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 166 | 3 |
118 | 7 | |
Scanned page | 316 | 2 |
Citation downloads | 83 | 0 |
Totals | 683 | 12 |
Total Views | 695 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.