To assess the importance of the route of glucose delivery in determining net hepatic glucose balance (NHGB) eight conscious overnight-fasted dogs were given glucose via the portal or a peripheral vein. NHGB was measured using the arteriovenous difference technique during a control and two 90-min glucose infusion periods. The sequence of infusions was randomized. Insulin and glucagon were held at constant basal levels using somatostatin and intraportal insulin and glucagon infusions during the control, portal, and peripheral glucose infusion periods (7 +/- 1, 7 +/- 1, 7 +/- 1 microU/ml; 100 +/- 3, 101 +/- 6, 101 +/- 3 pg/ml, respectively). In the three periods the hepatic blood flow, glucose infusion rate, arterial glucose level, hepatic glucose load, arterial-portal glucose difference and NHGB were 37 +/- 1, 34 +/- 1, 32 +/- 3 ml/kg per min; 0 +/- 0, 4.51 +/- 0.57, 4.23 +/- 0.34 mg/kg per min; 101 +/- 5, 200 +/- 15, 217 +/- 13 mg/dl; 28.5 +/- 3.5, 57.2 +/- 6.7, 54.0 +/- 6.4 mg/kg per min; +2 +/- 1, -22 +/- 3, +4 +/- 1 mg/dl; and 2.22 +/- 0.28, -1.41 +/- 0.31, and 0.08 +/- 0.23 mg/kg per min, respectively. Thus when glucose was delivered via a peripheral vein the liver did not take up glucose but when a similar glucose load was delivered intraportally the liver took up 32% (P less than 0.01) of it. In conclusion portal glucose delivery provides a signal important for the normal hepatic-peripheral distribution of a glucose load.
B A Adkins, S R Myers, G K Hendrick, R W Stevenson, P E Williams, A D Cherrington
Usage data is cumulative from December 2024 through December 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 212 | 19 |
| 77 | 6 | |
| Scanned page | 311 | 4 |
| Citation downloads | 75 | 0 |
| Totals | 675 | 29 |
| Total Views | 704 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.