Usage Information
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1986;78(3):674-679. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI112626.
Abstract
Vasopressin's role as a vasoconstrictor in chronic heart failure, was examined in rabbits with adriamycin cardiomyopathic congestive heart failure. Chronic adriamycin treatment resulted in a decrease in cardiac output (829 +/- 38-610 +/- 36 ml/min, P less than 0.005) and blood pressure (83 +/- 2-76 +/- 3 mmHg, P less than 0.01), and an increase in peripheral resistance (8,377 +/- 381-10,170 +/- 657 dyn-s-cm-5, P less than 0.05). Plasma renin activity (4.7 +/- 0.6-10.9 +/- 2.8 ng angiotensin I/ml X h) and norepinephrine (0.7 +/- 0.1-1.3 +/- 0.2 pmol/ml, P less than 0.05) increased while plasma vasopressin levels did not change. Vasopressin infusion, however, produced significantly greater increases in peripheral resistance in animals with heart failure than in controls. Moreover, a specific vasopressin vascular antagonist reduced blood pressure (7 +/- 3%) and peripheral resistance (14 +/- 4%) and increased cardiac output (10 +/- 3%) in animals with heart failure but had no cardiovascular effects in normal rabbits. These results suggest that vascular sensitivity to vasopressin is increased in heart failure, and that it contributes significantly to the increased afterload in heart failure despite normal plasma levels. In this model of severe, chronic heart failure the sympathetic, renin-angiotensin, and vasopressin systems all appear to be activated.
Authors
L Arnolda, B P McGrath, M Cocks, C I Johnston
Usage data is cumulative from June 2024 through June 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 103 | 2 |
| 48 | 12 | |
| Scanned page | 217 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 45 | 0 |
| Totals | 413 | 14 |
| Total Views | 427 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)