Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

In vivo interaction of synthetic acylated apopeptides with high density lipoproteins in rat.
G Ponsin, … , A M Gotto Jr, H J Pownall
G Ponsin, … , A M Gotto Jr, H J Pownall
Published February 1, 1986
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1986;77(2):559-567. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI112337.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

In vivo interaction of synthetic acylated apopeptides with high density lipoproteins in rat.

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The metabolism of synthetic peptide analogues of high density lipoprotein (HDL) apoproteins has been studied in the rat. These compounds are 15-amino acid lipid associating peptides (LAPs) bearing acyl chains of various lengths (0-16 carbon units). After injection of each 125I-LAP, the serum decay curves suggested a two-compartment process with a clearance rate decreasing when the acyl chain lengths increased. The similarity between the apparent half-life of C16-LAP and that of apoprotein A-I as well as the chromatographic analysis of rat serum were consistent with a partitioning of the LAPs between HDL and the aqueous phase. This was strongly dependent upon the acyl chain length of the LAPs. The distribution volumes of the 125I-LAPs in organs were measured 10 min after injection. The results were analyzed using a model explicitly predicting the organ distribution volumes of HDL and the equilibrium constant (Keq) of the binding of each LAP to HDL. HDL distributed significantly in the adrenals (250 microliters/g), liver (80 microliters/g), and ovaries (55 microliters/g), but not in the kidneys. This suggests that the binding of HDL apoproteins to kidneys, reported by others, was due to the uptake of free apoproteins. The Keqs exhibited a log-linear relationship with respect to the acyl chain length of the LAPs. Each carbon unit added to the acyl chain decreased the free energy of association by a constant value (0.3 kcal mol-1). This clearly showed a strict hydrophobic effect similar to that previously observed in vitro.

Authors

G Ponsin, J T Sparrow, A M Gotto Jr, H J Pownall

×

Usage data is cumulative from July 2024 through July 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 104 3
PDF 53 6
Scanned page 323 0
Citation downloads 42 0
Totals 522 9
Total Views 531
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts