Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

In vivo and in vitro studies of urinary concentrating ability in potassium-depleted rabbits.
K H Raymond, … , K K Davidson, T D McKinney
K H Raymond, … , K K Davidson, T D McKinney
Published August 1, 1985
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1985;76(2):561-566. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI112007.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

In vivo and in vitro studies of urinary concentrating ability in potassium-depleted rabbits.

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The factors responsible for the urinary concentrating defect associated with the potassium-depleted (KD) state are uncertain. The present studies were designed to, first, determine whether a urinary concentrating defect exists in potassium-depleted rabbits and, second, to use the technique of in vitro perfusion to evaluate directly the antidiuretic hormone (ADH) responsiveness of cortical collecting tubules (CCT) in this setting. Feeding female New Zealand White rabbits a potassium-deficient diet for 2 wk caused a significant fall in plasma potassium levels in both the ad-libitum and controlled water intake groups (P less than 0.001). Muscle potassium content after 2 wk of potassium restriction fell from 45.6 +/- 0.9 to 29.0 +/- 1.2 meq/100 g fat-free dry solids (P less than 0.001). Renal papillary sodium content fell significantly from a control value of 234.6 +/- 8.0 to 182.46 +/- 10.0 meq/kg H2O after 2 wk of potassium restriction. Maximal urinary osmolality measured after 12 h of dehydration and 1.25 U pitressin IM was significantly decreased in rabbits after 2 wk of potassium restriction in both the ad-libitum and controlled water intake groups (P less than 0.001). The relationship between plasma potassium concentration and maximum urinary osmolality was significantly correlated in both the ad-libitum and controlled water intake groups, r = 0.73 and 0.68 (P less than 0.001), respectively. In addition, refeeding KD rabbits with normal chow for 1 wk resulted in normalization of both plasma potassium levels and urinary concentrating ability. CCT from control and KD rabbits were perfused in vitro at 25 degrees C. The hydraulic conductivity coefficient, Lp, was significantly reduced at all doses of ADH tested in tubules from KD rabbits when compared with control tubules. In addition, the maximal hydraulic conductivity in tubules from KD rabbits when tested with 200 microU/ml ADH at 37.5 degrees C was only 23% of control values (P less than 0.05). Furthermore, this reduced ADH responsiveness persisted when the bath potassium was elevated from 5 to 20 mM. The reflection coefficient for NaCl when compared with raffinose was 0.91 in tubules from KD animals. Thus, these data suggest that the ADH-resistant urinary concentrating defect associated with potassium depletion is due, at least in part, to a diminished responsiveness of the CCT to ADH. Therefore, further studies were designed to investigate the cellular steps involved in this abnormal response. There was no difference in the 8-para-chlorophenylthio cyclic AMP induced hydroosmotic response between CCT from KD and control rabbits. Since the cAMP-induced hydroosmotic response was similar between KD and control CCT, experiments were performed to evaluate the contribution of phosphodiesterase (PDIE) activity by using the potent PDIE inhibitor isobutylmethylxanthine (10(-4) and 10(-3)M) in the presence of ADH (200 U/ml). Although Lp was increased by PDIE inhibition in CCT from both control and KD animals, the overall hydroosmotic response in CCT from KD rabbits was still significantly reduced when compared with controls. The final experiments used forskolin to evaluate further the adenylate cyclase complex. The resulting hydroosmotic response in CCT from KD rabbits was almost identical to that obtained in controls. In conclusion, these data suggest that the decreased responsiveness of CCT from KD rabbits to ADH involves a step at or proximal to the stimulation of the catalytic subunit of adenylate cyclase, and that PDIE activity makes no contribution to this abnormal hydroosmotic response.

Authors

K H Raymond, K K Davidson, T D McKinney

×

Usage data is cumulative from September 2024 through September 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 101 2
PDF 46 6
Scanned page 109 0
Citation downloads 39 0
Totals 295 8
Total Views 303
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts