This study was designed to establish the relationship between urinary pCO2 and systemic blood pCO2 during acute hypercapnia and to investigate the significance of this relationship to collecting duct hydrogen ion (H+) secretion when the urine is acid and when it is highly alkaline. In rats excreting a highly alkaline urine, an acute increase in blood pCO2 (from 42 +/- 0.8 to 87 +/- 0.8 mmHg) resulted in a significant fall in urine minus blood (U-B) pCO2 (from 31 +/- 2.0 to 16 +/- 4.2 mmHg, P less than 0.005), a finding which could be interpreted to indicate inhibition of collecting duct H+ secretion by hypercapnia. The urinary pCO2 of rats with hypercapnia, unlike that of normocapnic controls, was significantly lower than that of blood when the urine was acid (58 +/- 6.3 and 86 +/- 1.7 mmHg, P less than 0.001) and when it was alkalinized in the face of accelerated carbonic acid dehydration by infusion of carbonic anhydrase (78 +/- 2.7 and 87 +/- 1.8 mmHg, P less than 0.02). The finding of a urinary pCO2 lower than systemic blood pCO2 during hypercapnia suggested that the urine pCO2 prevailing before bicarbonate loading should be known and the blood pCO2 kept constant to evaluate collecting duct H+ secretion using the urinary pCO2 technique. In experiments performed under these conditions, sodium bicarbonate infusion resulted in an increment in urinary pCO2 (i.e., a delta pCO2) which was comparable in hypercapnic and normocapnic rats (40 +/- 7.2 and 42 +/- 4.6 mmHg, respectively) that were alkalemic (blood pH 7.53 +/- 0.02 and 7.69 +/- 0.01, respectively). The U-B pCO2, however, was again lower in hypercapnic than in normocapnic rats (15 +/- 4.0 and 39 +/- 2.5 mmHg, respectively, P less than 0.001). In hypercapnic rats in which blood pH during bicarbonate infusion was not allowed to become alkalemic (7.38 +/- 0.01), the delta pCO2 was higher than that of normocapnic rats which were alkalemic (70 +/- 5.6 and 42 +/- 4.6 mmHg, respectively, P less than 0.005) while the U-B pCO2 was about the same (39 +/- 3.7 and 39 +/- 2.5 mmHg). We further examined urine pCO2 generation by measuring the difference between the urine pCO2 of a highly alkaline urine not containing carbonic anhydrase and that of an equally alkaline urine containing this enzyme. Carbonic anhydrase infusion to hypercapnic rats that were not alkalemic resulted in a fall in urine pCO(2) (from 122+/-5.7 to 77+/-2.2 mmHg) which was greater (P <0.02) than that seen in alkalemic normocapnic controls (from 73+/- 1.9 to 43+/-1.3 mmHg) with a comparable urine bicarbonate concentration and urine nonbicarbonate buffer capacity. CO(2) generation, therefore, from collecting dust H(+) secretion and titration of bicarbonate, was higher in hypercapnic rats that in normocapnic controls. We conclude that in rats with actue hypercapnia, the U-B p(CO(2)) achieved during bicarbonate loading greatly underestimates collecting duct H(+) secretion because it is artificially influenced by systemic blood pCO(2). the deltapCO(2) is a better qualitative index of collecting duct H+ secretion that the U-B pCO(2), because it is not artificially influenced by systemic blood pCO(2) and it takes into account the urine PCO(2) prevailing before bicarbonate loading.
D C Batlle, M Downer, C Gutterman, N A Kurtzman
Usage data is cumulative from June 2024 through June 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 152 | 235 |
43 | 17 | |
Scanned page | 621 | 4 |
Citation downloads | 84 | 0 |
Totals | 900 | 256 |
Total Views | 1,156 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.