Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Research Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI111261

Relationship between systemic lupus erythematosus T cell subsets, anti-T cell antibodies, and T cell functions.

C Morimoto, E L Reinherz, J A Distaso, A D Steinberg, and S F Schlossman

Find articles by Morimoto, C. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Find articles by Reinherz, E. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Find articles by Distaso, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Find articles by Steinberg, A. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Find articles by Schlossman, S. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published March 1, 1984 - More info

Published in Volume 73, Issue 3 on March 1, 1984
J Clin Invest. 1984;73(3):689–700. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI111261.
© 1984 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published March 1, 1984 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

Previous studies have shown that patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) had differing T cell T4+/T8+ ratios and that the ratio correlated with clinical features of the disease. In the present study, we wished to determine whether the peripheral blood T cell subsets in these patients were related to the specificity of anti-T cell antibodies found in their plasma. Plasma from 24 SLE patients that reacted with greater than 20% of normal T cells were analyzed for their effect on in vitro pokeweed mitogen-stimulated immunoglobulin synthesis and for their reactivity with human T4+ and T8+ cells. Anti-T cell antibodies found in SLE patients have a spectrum of reactivities. We concentrated upon antibodies that interfere with suppressor function. One group of SLE anti-T cell antibodies reacts preferentially with the T8+ suppressor effector cell whereas another is reactive with T4+ suppressor inducer subsets. SLE patients with high T4+/T8+ ratios had anti-T cell antibodies predominantly reactive with the T8+ suppressor effector cells. Patients with low T4+/T8+ ratios, on the other hand, had anti-T cell antibodies reactive with either the T4+ suppressor inducer or with both the T4+ suppressor inducer and T8+ suppressor effector cells. In addition, a fourth group was defined whose anti-T cell antibodies were neither reactive with a functional T4+ suppressor inducer nor a functional T8+ suppressor effector cells. There was a significant correlation between the circulating T4+/T8+ ratio of peripheral T cells in these patients and the relative ability of their anti-T cell antibodies to kill T8+ cells vs. T4+ cells (gamma = 0.666, P less than 0.001). These results support the notion that in SLE different cellular defects in the immunoregulatory circuit underlie the development of autoimmune reactions and that the anti-T cell antibodies may cause numerical and functional deficiencies in T cell subsets.

Images.

Browse pages

Click on an image below to see the page. View PDF of the complete article

icon of scanned page 689
page 689
icon of scanned page 690
page 690
icon of scanned page 691
page 691
icon of scanned page 692
page 692
icon of scanned page 693
page 693
icon of scanned page 694
page 694
icon of scanned page 695
page 695
icon of scanned page 696
page 696
icon of scanned page 697
page 697
icon of scanned page 698
page 698
icon of scanned page 699
page 699
icon of scanned page 700
page 700
Version history
  • Version 1 (March 1, 1984): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts