The insulin-binding isotherms and the structural composition of human liver insulin receptors were examined by using plasma membranes that were prepared from liver biopsies of nine non-obese and 10 obese subjects undergoing elective surgery. The insulin-binding characteristics of liver membranes from non-obese subjects were quite similar to those previously described in rat liver membranes. However, when the membranes from obese subjects were compared with the non-obese group, insulin-binding activity was reduced by 50% (P less than 0.01). The reduction in obesity resulted primarily from a decrease in total receptor number, although a small decrease in receptor affinity was also observed. Insulin binding was not correlated with sex or with the fasting plasma insulin level. The insulin-binding sites of liver membranes were affinity-labeled with 125I-insulin and the cross-linking reagent, disuccinimidyl suberate. The liver membranes from both the non-obese and the obese group had heterogenous (nonreduced) insulin-binding species of 300,000, 260,000, and 150,000 mol wt, which were again comparable to the findings reported in rat liver. Sulfhydryl reduction demonstrated a major sub-unit of 125,000 and a minor component of 40,000-45,000 in both groups. These results indicate a close similarity between the hepatic insulin receptor of man and the more intensely studied rat hepatic receptor. Obesity in human subjects is associated with a loss of hepatic insulin receptors. This alteration may contribute to the insulin resistance reported in this organ as well as to obesity-mediated glucose tolerance.
P Arner, K Einarsson, L Backman, K Nilsell, K M Lerea, J N Livingston
Usage data is cumulative from July 2024 through July 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 193 | 2 |
52 | 11 | |
Figure | 0 | 1 |
Scanned page | 310 | 1 |
Citation downloads | 58 | 0 |
Totals | 613 | 15 |
Total Views | 628 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.