To determine whether the antidiarrheal action of opiate drugs in humans is due to enhanced intestinal absorption rates, as suggested by recent experiments in animals, or is due to altered intestinal motility, as traditionally thought, we studied the effect of therapeutic doses of codeine on experimental diarrhea and on the rate of intestinal absorption of water and electrolytes in normal human subjects. Our results show that codeine (30-60 mg i.m.) markedly reduced stool volume during experimental diarrhea induced by rapid intragastric infusion of a balanced electrolyte solution. There was, however, no evidence that codeine stimulated the rate of intestinal absorption in the gut as a whole or in any segment of the gastrointestinal tract, either in the basal state or when absorption rates were reduced by intravenous infusion of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide. We also measured segmental transit times to determine whether and where codeine delayed the passage of fluid through the intestine. Codeine caused a marked slowing of fluid movement through the jejunum, but had no effect on the movement of fluid through the ileum or colon. In other studies, we found that the opiate antagonist naloxone did not significantly affect water or electrolyte absorption rates in the jejunum or ileum. We conclude (a) that therapeutic doses of codeine increase net intestinal absorption (and thereby reduce stool volume) by increasing the contact time of luminal fluid with mucosal cells, not by increasing the rate of absorption by the mucosal cells; and (b) that endogenous opiates do not regulate intestinal absorption in humans.
Lawrence R. Schiller, Glenn R. Davis, Carol A. Santa Ana, Stephen G. Morawski, John S. Fordtran
Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 425 | 282 |
85 | 47 | |
Scanned page | 403 | 53 |
Citation downloads | 80 | 0 |
Totals | 993 | 382 |
Total Views | 1,375 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.