Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

Comparison of different antinucleic acid antibody spectrotypes in spontaneous, induced, and murine lupus.
M Fischbach, … , J Rabbie, N Talal
M Fischbach, … , J Rabbie, N Talal
Published October 1, 1981
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1981;68(4):1036-1043. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI110326.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

Comparison of different antinucleic acid antibody spectrotypes in spontaneous, induced, and murine lupus.

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Sera from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and from mice spontaneously developing lupus were subjected to isoelectric focusing by a microsucrose gradient method. The spectrotypes of human antibodies to native DNA, denatured DNA, and polyriboadenylic acid (poly A) were compared. Antibodies to native DNA and denatured DNA focused into two regions whose boundaries were pH 5.0-7.0 and pH 8.5-10.0. Antinative DNA antibodies were more homogeneous than antidenatured DNA antibodies. Anti-DNA antibodies in cryoglobulins showed more restriction than those present in serum. There was no relationship between spectrotype and pattern of disease expression. Murine antibodies to native DNA were more heterogeneous than human anti-DNA antibodies. The spectrotypes of antidenatured DNA antibodies from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus or drug induced lupus, or from an immunized rabbit, were similar. Likewise, antibodies to poly A were similar in both human and murine lupus. In contrast to anti-DNA, antibodies to poly A were restricted and focused only in the alkaline range (pH 9.5-10.0). The spectrotype of antipoly A antibodies induced by lipopolysaccharide were comparable but had an additional small band at pH 6.2. Our results suggest unique antibody spectrotypes with varying degrees of restriction for different nucleic acid antigens. Furthermore, spontaneous and induced autoantibodies have similar spectrotypes. Thus, the B cell clones producing antinucleic acid antibodies may be similar whether they are activated spontaneously, following immunization, or as a consequence of polyclonal stimulation.

Authors

M Fischbach, J Rabbie, N Talal

×

Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 98 0
PDF 47 18
Scanned page 244 1
Citation downloads 51 0
Totals 440 19
Total Views 459
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts