Antagonism between Epidermal Growth Factor and Phorbol Ester Tumor Promoters in Human Breast Cancer Cells

• Text
• PDF

Abstract

It has been suggested that the phorbol ester tumor promoters act via the receptor-effector system for epidermal growth factor (EGF), since they interact with the EGF receptor system and mimic many of the effects of EGF in cultured cells. We have studied the interaction of phorbol esters with the EGF-responsive MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line. Similar to other systems, phorbol esters inhibit EGF binding in MCF-7 cells in a manner paralleling their potency as tumor promoters in mice. The effect is specific for EGF since the membrane binding of insulin is unaffected. Like EGF, the potent phorbol ester 12-O-tetradecanoyl-13-phorbol acetate (TPA) stimulates protein synthesis as indicated by a twofold increase in [3H]leucine incorporation into protein after 24 h in TPA. Cell morphology, however, is significantly different with TPA treatment. After 24-48 h in TPA, cells become markedly enlarged with increased cytoplasmic vacuolization and increased membrane microvilli. This is reflected in a fourfold increase in the protein/DNA ratio (control 13.1; TPA 55.9). Furthermore, TPA inhibits cell division in media with or without serum, and prevents growth stimulation by EGF. Low TPA concentrations (1.0 ng/ml) are active, and 10 ng/ml results in maximal inhibition of cell replication. Other phorbol esters inhibit MCF-7 cells relative to their tumor promoting activity in vivo and their ability to inhibit EGF binding in these cells. After 24 h in TPA, incorporation of [3H]thymidine into DNA is markedly reduced and the thymidine labeling index falls (33% to 2%) indicating very few S-phase cells. Growth inhibition is reversible by removing TPA from the medium. Similar inhibitory effects are seen with the two other human breast cancer cell lines studied, ZR75-1 and MDA-MB-231. In conclusion, phorbol esters may interact with the EGF receptor domain in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells, but they have distinct effects on cell morphology and growth suggesting alternative pathways of action. The antineoplastic activity of these compounds needs further investigation.

Authors

C. Kent Osborne, Barbara Hamilton, Marianne Nover, Jeanette Ziegler