Investigative data have suggested that the extrapancreatic actions of the sulfonylureas may be paramount in their chronic antidiabetic action. The present study examines the effects of chronic sulfonylurea treatment on in vivo insulin action. Peripheral insulin levels, hepatic glucose production (Ra), and overall glucose disposal (Rd) were studied in six awake, normal dogs given both 0.5 and 1.0 mU/kg per min pork insulin for 2.5 h. This produces stable hyperinsulinemia from 15 to 150 min. Fasting euglycemia was held constant by the glucose clamp technique and averaged 99% basal glucose in all studies. Ra and Rd were determined from infusion of [3-(3)H]glucose, begun 90 min prior to insulin infusion. 10 mg of the sulfonylurea glipizide, was given daily to the test animals for the 10 to 20 d following appropriate control studies, then was withheld for 24 h, and the dogs were restudied. Glipizide treatment did not significantly alter basal glucose turnover, Ra, mean glucose values, or mean insulin levels as determined by radioimmunoassay. Increase in Rd above basal glucose turnover in response to insulin (delta Rd) was significantly (P less than 0.05) increased by glipizide treatment at both insulin dosage levels (paired analysis). At 1.0 mU/kg per min insulin, delta Rd rose from 2.6 mg/kg per min before glipizide to 6.5 mg/kg per min after glipizide treatment. At 0.5 mU/kg per min insulin, delta Rd went from 1.1 mg/kg per min before glipizide to 2.2 mg/kg per min after glipizide treatment. Glipizide treatment doubled the effects of insulin on Rd, while showing no significant effect upon insulin suppression of Ra. We conclude that a significant extrapancreatic chronic action of glipizide lies in its ability to selectively potentiate Rd.
W S Putnam, D K Andersen, R S Jones, H E Lebovitz
Usage data is cumulative from July 2024 through July 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 167 | 3 |
99 | 6 | |
Scanned page | 328 | 3 |
Citation downloads | 55 | 0 |
Totals | 649 | 12 |
Total Views | 661 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.