Using the in vitro DNA labeling technique of nick translation on purified plasma DNA, we have estimated the plasma DNA concentration in three normal individuals to be 266 +/- 57 ng/ml (mean +/- SD). This was not significantly different in three patients with a chronic inflammatory disease (209 +/- 14 ng/ml) or in five patients with steroid-inactivated systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (293 +/- 57 ng/ml). In two untreated, newly diagnosed, active SLE patients, however, the plasma DNA concentration was considerably higher (4,024 and 2,437 ng/ml, respectively). Characterization of these in vitro labeled DNA preparations by neutral sucrose-gradient sedimentation analysis showed a sedimentation coefficient of 6-8S, corresponding to a molecular weight of similar to or approximately 0.2-0.45 x 10(6). No difference was observed between normal subjects or patients. In addition, the relative size uniformity of these DNA molecules might suggest some form of specific protection of the DNA from blood DNAases. Further characterization in terms of buoyant density in cesium chloride did not reveal a difference between normal or SLE plasma and the human (HEp-2 cell) DNA used as marker. Taking into account the limitations of the method, no indication of a possible exogenous origin of the DNA circulating in SLE patients could be found. The physiological or pathophysiological role of this plasma DNA remains to be determined.
L Raptis, H A Menard
Usage data is cumulative from September 2024 through September 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 240 | 11 |
31 | 10 | |
Scanned page | 123 | 3 |
Citation downloads | 30 | 0 |
Totals | 424 | 24 |
Total Views | 448 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.