Using a radioimmunoassay with labeled synthetic tetradecapeptide somatostatin, a large amount of immunoreactive somatostatin was found in the principal pancreatic islet of the channel catfish (Ictalurus punctata). The purpose of these experiments was to isolate and characterize the somatostatin-like material. Extracts of islets were chromatographed on a Bio-Gel P-30 column, and over 90% of the immunoreactive somatostatin migrated with proteins at least twice the size of synthetic tetradecapeptide somatostatin. This fraction was further purified by ion-exchange chromatography on carboxymethyl-cellulose and DEAE-cellulose columns. Two peptides were obtained with identical immunoreactivity, which was ∼25% that of the synthetic somatostatin. Each peptide was judged to be >95% pure by thin-layer electrophoresis, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis at pH 8.9, and highpressure liquid chromatography. Further criteria of purity included amino-terminal analysis of fraction IV yielding only aspartic acid. A total of 1.3 mg of fraction II, and 3.8 mg of fraction IV somatostatin-like peptides were obtained from 10 g of fresh frozen islets.
Hideki Oyama, Harry J. Hirsch, Kenneth H. Gabbay, Alan Permutt
Usage data is cumulative from January 2025 through January 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 124 | 1 |
| 62 | 2 | |
| Scanned page | 324 | 3 |
| Citation downloads | 89 | 0 |
| Totals | 599 | 6 |
| Total Views | 605 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.