Although it is generally accepted that DNA:anti-DNA immune complexes play a significant role in the pathogenesis of tissue injury in systemic lupus erythematosus, their presence in the circulation is still a matter of controversy. In this study, we detected DNA:anti-DNA compexes by identification of both the antigen and(or) the antibody, the necessary requisites for immune complex definition, in 14 of 24 plasmas (7 of 11 patients). These antibodies were specific for native DNA and could be adsorbed by anti-immunoglobulin (Ig)G antisera. The DNA recovered was, at least in part, of low molecular weight. The presence of DNA:anti-DNA compexes was not related to high molecular weight IgG, cryoprecipitins, positive polyethylene glycol precipitation, or low plasma C3 levels. It was related significantly to low plasma C4 levels and to the presence of diffuse proliferative nephritis. The lack of correlation with other methods of detection of immune complexes and with the presence of heavy IgG (above 13 S) is in favor of the existence of other antigen-antibody systems (or aggregated immunoglobulins) in systemic lupus erythematosus plasmas. From the results, it appears that methods directed towards the demonstration of specific immune complexes are more informative than those detecting heavy or altered immunoglobulins.
C Bruneau, J Benveniste
Usage data is cumulative from March 2023 through March 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 107 | 0 |
52 | 16 | |
Scanned page | 127 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 12 | 0 |
Totals | 298 | 16 |
Total Views | 314 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.