Binding of [3H]dihydroergocryptine to platelet lysates appears to have all the characteristics of binding to α-adrenergic receptors. At 25°C binding reaches equilibrium within 20 min and is reversible upon addition of excess phentolamine. Binding is saturable with 183±22 fmol of [3H]dihydroergocryptine bound per mg of protein at saturation, corresponding to 220±26 sites per platelet. Kinetic and equilibrium studies indicate the dissociation constant of [3H]dihydroergocryptine for the receptors is 1-3 nM. The specificity of the binding sites is typical of an α-adrenergic receptor. Catecholamine agonists compete for occupancy of the [3H]dihydroergocryptine binding sites with an order of potency (−)epinephrine> (−)norepinephrine≫ (−)isoproterenol. Stereospecificity was demonstrated inasmuch as the (+)isomers of epinephrine and norepinephrine were 10-20-fold less potent than the (−)isomers. The potent α-adrenergic antagonists phentolamine, phenoxybenzamine, and yohimbine competed potently for the sites, whereas β-antagonists such as propranolol and dichlorisoproterenol were quite weak. Dopamine and serotonin competed only at high concentrations (0.1 mM).
Kurt D. Newman, Lewis T. Williams, N. Hahr Bishopric, Robert J. Lefkowitz
Usage data is cumulative from September 2023 through September 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 137 | 0 |
81 | 31 | |
Scanned page | 228 | 4 |
Citation downloads | 31 | 0 |
Totals | 477 | 35 |
Total Views | 512 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.