Usage Information
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1977;59(1):125-133. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI108609.
Abstract
Intravenous administration of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) caused a dose-dependent contraction in the lower esophageal sphincter in the opossum. The smallest dose of 5-HT which caused a detectable contraction of the sphincter was 0.5 mug/kg, and a maximal sphincter contraction was produced by a dose of 40 mug/kg. Methysergide converted the contractile effect of 5-HT to a dose-dependent fall in the sphincter pressure; maximal inhibition of 77.2 +/- 7.2% of the resting pressure occurred with a dose of 40 mug/kg. The inhibitory effect of 5-HT was antagonized by tetrodotoxin, 5 MeO-DMT, and 5-HT tachyphylaxis. 5 MeO-DMT enhanced 5-HT-induced contraction of the sphincter. In the presence of 5 MeO-DMT and methysergide, 5-HT still caused a brief contraction of the sphincter; this contraction appeared to be due to stimulation of postganglionic cholinergic neurons as it was antagonized by tetrodotoxin or atropine. Reserpinization caused enhancement of the sphincter contraction by 5-HT. In the reserpinized animals in the presence of methysergide, 5-HT caused a small initial contraction followed by prolonged inhibition; atropine antagonized the initial contraction, while inhibition was antagonized by 5 MeO-DMT. These studies are consistent with the view that 5-HT exerts several different effects on the sphincter. 5-HT causes contraction of the sphincter by its direct action on the muscle and also by stimulation of cholinergic excitatory neurons. In addition, 5-HT inhibits the sphincter by stimulation of nonadrenergic inhibitory neurons.
Authors
S Rattan, R K Goyal
Usage data is cumulative from August 2024 through August 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 105 | 16 |
| 54 | 9 | |
| Scanned page | 356 | 5 |
| Citation downloads | 67 | 0 |
| Totals | 582 | 30 |
| Total Views | 612 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)