A gel filtration fraction of urine from patients with chronic renal disease (natriuretic factor) has been shown previously to cause natriuresis in rats and to inhibit sodium transport in the isolated toad bladder. The effect of this fraction on transtubular potential difference and sodium transport was examined on the isolated perfused cortical collecting tubule of the rabbit. A rapid inhibition of potential difference from -22.5 mV to -12 mV (P less than 0.001) was observed when the fraction was applied to the peritubular surface. This effect was accompanied by a decrease in net sodium flux from 6.29 to 3.21 pmol/cm per s (P less than 0.001). Unidirectional fluxes using isotopic sodium revealed that the inhibition of net sodium transport was due to a decrease in flux from the lumen to the peritubular surface, i.e., an inhibition of active sodium transport. There was no change in sodium flux in the reverse direction. These changes were all rapidly reversed by removal of the fraction from the peritubular surface. The addition of the fraction to the lumen had no effect on potential difference or net sodium flux. Control studies using the same fraction from the urine of normal subjects had no effect on any of the parameters studies. Where both a uremic and a normal fraction were sequentially applied to the peritubular surface of the same tubule, inhibition of potential difference was obtained only with the former. In the light of evidence implicating the collecting duct fraction from normal animals, the data are consistent with the view that the natriuretic factor may be biologically important in the regulation of sodium balance via it's regulatory role in active sodium transport in the collecting tubule.
L G Fine, J J Bourgoignie, K H Hwang, N S Bricker
Usage data is cumulative from June 2024 through June 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 105 | 2 |
52 | 8 | |
Scanned page | 345 | 5 |
Citation downloads | 64 | 0 |
Totals | 566 | 15 |
Total Views | 581 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.