Insulin binding to isolated adipocytes from 16 normal and 14 obese patients was studied. The data indicated that, as a group, adipocytes from the obese patients bound significantly less insulin than normal. However, of the 14 obese patients, 5 were not hyperinsulinemic and 4 of these 5 subjects had normal insulin binding. These subjects were also younger, and had the onset of obesity in childhood. When these five patients were separated from the original 14 obese patients, enhanced differences in insulin binding to adipocytes were observed when normals and the remaining 9 obese subjects were compared. Similar findings were obtained with isolated circulating mononuclear cells from these same patients. Presumably the five normoinsulinemic obese patients were not insulin-resistant, and, thus, the data indicate that insulin binding to adipocytes was decreased only in insulin-resistant obese patients. This conclusion was strengthened by finding a highly significant correlation (r=-0.71, p less than 0.001) between insulin binding to adipocytes and fasting plasma insulin level, while a weaker correlation (r=-0.49,p less than 0.01) existed between insulin binding and degree of obesity. Finally, when insulin binding to adipocytes and mononuclear cells from the same individual was compared, a significant positive correlation was found (r=0.53,p less than 0.01). In conclusion: (a) insulin binding to adipocytes and mononuclear cells is decreased in cells from insulin-resistant obese patients; (b) a significant inverse relationship exists between fasting plasma insulin level and insulin binding to adipocytes; and (c) in obesity, events that affect insulin receptors on adipocytes similarly affect insulin receptors on mononuclear cells.
J M Olefsky
Usage data is cumulative from February 2022 through February 2023.
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.