Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Research Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI107869

The Cardiovascular Effects of Morphine THE PERIPHERAL CAPACITANCE AND RESISTANCE VESSELS IN HUMAN SUBJECTS

Robert Zelis, Edward J. Mansour, Robert J. Capone, and Dean T. Mason

1Laboratory of Clinical Physiology, Cardiology Section, University of California at Davis, School of Medicine, Davis, California 95616

Find articles by Zelis, R. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Laboratory of Clinical Physiology, Cardiology Section, University of California at Davis, School of Medicine, Davis, California 95616

Find articles by Mansour, E. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Laboratory of Clinical Physiology, Cardiology Section, University of California at Davis, School of Medicine, Davis, California 95616

Find articles by Capone, R. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Laboratory of Clinical Physiology, Cardiology Section, University of California at Davis, School of Medicine, Davis, California 95616

Find articles by Mason, D. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published December 1, 1974 - More info

Published in Volume 54, Issue 6 on December 1, 1974
J Clin Invest. 1974;54(6):1247–1258. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI107869.
© 1974 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published December 1, 1974 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

To evaluate the effects of morphine on the peripheral venous and arterial beds, 69 normal subjects were evaluated before and after the intravenous administration of 15 mg morphine. Venous tone was determined by three independent techniques in 22 subjects. The venous pressure measured in a hand vein during temporary circulatory arrest (isolated hand vein technique) fell from 20.2±1.4 to 13.4±0.9 mm Hg (P < 0.01) 10 min after morphine, indicating that a significant venodilation had occurred. With the acute occlusion technique, morphine induced a reduction in forearm venous tone from 12.8±1.1 to 7.9±2.3 mm Hg/ml/100 ml (P < 0.01). Although forearm venous volume at a pressure of 30 mm Hg (VV[30]) was increased from 2.26±0.17 to 2.55±0.26 ml/100 ml, measured by the equilibration technique, the change was not significant (P > 0.1). Of note is that the initial reaction to morphine was a pronounced venoconstriction, demonstrated during the first 1-2 min after the drug. (Isolated hand vein pressure increased to 37.2±5.4 mm Hg, P < 0.01). This rapidly subsided, and by 5 min a venodilation was evident. Morphine did not attenuate the venoconstrictor response to a single deep breath, mental arithmetic, or the application of ice to the forehead when measured by either the isolated hand vein technique or the equilibration technique.

To evaluate the effects of morphine on the peripheral resistance vessels in 47 normal subjects, forearm blood flow was measured plethysmographically before and 10-15 min after the intravenous administration of 15 mg of morphine. Although mean systemic arterial pressure was unchanged, forearm blood flow increased from 2.92±0.28 to 3.96±0.46 ml/min/100 ml (P < 0.01), and calculated vascular resistance fell from 42.4±5.2 to 31.6±3.2 mm Hg/ml/min/100 ml (P < 0.01). When subjects were tilted to the 45° head-up position, morphine did not block the increase in total peripheral vascular resistance that occurs; however, it did significantly attenuate the forearm arteriolar constrictor response (before morphine, + 25.7±5.4; after morphine, + 13.7±5.3 mm Hg/ml/min/100 ml, P < 0.05). However, morphine did not block the post-Valsalva overshoot of blood pressure, nor did it block the increase in forearm vascular resistance produced by the application of ice to the forehead. Similarly, morphine did not block the arteriolar or venoconstrictor effects of intra-arterially administered norepinephrine.

Morphine infused into the brachial artery in doses up to 200 μg/min produced no changes in ipsilateral forearm VV[30], forearm blood flow, or calculated forearm resistance. Intra-arterial promethazine, atropine, and propranolol did not block the forearm arteriolar dilator response to intravenous morphine; however, intra-arterial phentolamine abolished the response. These data suggest that in human subjects, morphine induces a peripheral venous and arteriolar dilation by a reflex reduction in sympathetic alpha adrenergic tone. Morphine does not appear to act as a peripheral alpha adrenergic blocking agent but seems to attenuate the sympathetic efferent discharge at a central nervous system level.

Images.

Browse pages

Click on an image below to see the page. View PDF of the complete article

icon of scanned page 1247
page 1247
icon of scanned page 1248
page 1248
icon of scanned page 1249
page 1249
icon of scanned page 1250
page 1250
icon of scanned page 1251
page 1251
icon of scanned page 1252
page 1252
icon of scanned page 1253
page 1253
icon of scanned page 1254
page 1254
icon of scanned page 1255
page 1255
icon of scanned page 1256
page 1256
icon of scanned page 1257
page 1257
icon of scanned page 1258
page 1258
Version history
  • Version 1 (December 1, 1974): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts