Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Immune Environment in Glioblastoma (Feb 2023)
    • Korsmeyer Award 25th Anniversary Collection (Jan 2023)
    • Aging (Jul 2022)
    • Next-Generation Sequencing in Medicine (Jun 2022)
    • New Therapeutic Targets in Cardiovascular Diseases (Mar 2022)
    • Immunometabolism (Jan 2022)
    • Circadian Rhythm (Oct 2021)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Research letters
    • Letters to the editor
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • In-Press Preview
  • Commentaries
  • Research letters
  • Letters to the editor
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Bone homeostasis in growth hormone receptor–null mice is restored by IGF-I but independent of Stat5
Natalie A. Sims, … , Roland Baron, Paul A. Kelly
Natalie A. Sims, … , Roland Baron, Paul A. Kelly
Published November 1, 2000
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2000;106(9):1095-1103. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI10753.
View: Text | PDF
Article

Bone homeostasis in growth hormone receptor–null mice is restored by IGF-I but independent of Stat5

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Growth hormone (GH) regulates both bone growth and remodeling, but it is unclear whether these actions are mediated directly by the GH receptor (GHR) and/or IGF-I signaling. The actions of GH are transduced by the Jak/Stat signaling pathway via Stat5, which is thought to regulate IGF-I expression. To determine the respective roles of GHR and IGF-I in bone growth and remodeling, we examined bones of wild-type, GHR knockout (GHR–/–), Stat5ab–/–, and GHR–/– mice treated with IGF-I. Reduced bone growth in GHR–/– mice, due to a premature reduction in chondrocyte proliferation and cortical bone growth, was detected after 2 weeks of age. Additionally, although trabecular bone volume was unchanged, bone turnover was significantly reduced in GHR–/– mice, indicating GH involvement in the high bone-turnover level during growth. IGF-I treatment almost completely rescued all effects of the GHR–/– on both bone growth and remodeling, supporting a direct effect of IGF-I on both osteoblasts and chondrocytes. Whereas bone length was reduced in Stat5ab–/– mice, there was no reduction in trabecular bone remodeling or growth-plate width as observed in GHR–/– mice, indicating that the effects of GH in bone may not involve Stat5 activation.

Authors

Natalie A. Sims, Philippe Clément-Lacroix, Francesca Da Ponte, Yasmina Bouali, Nadine Binart, Richard Moriggl, Vincent Goffin, Karen Coschigano, Martine Gaillard-Kelly, John Kopchick, Roland Baron, Paul A. Kelly

×

Figure 1

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Impaired growth of GHR–/– mice. (a) Growth curves of total body length (...
Impaired growth of GHR–/– mice. (a) Growth curves of total body length (left) and femoral length (right) in wild-type (+/+) and GHR–/– (–/–) mice (n = 8 per group). AP < 0.01, and BP < 0.001 vs. wild-type. (b) Toluidine blue–stained proximal tibial sections from wild-type and GHR–/– mice at 2, 3, 4, 6, and 10 weeks. Horizontal bars indicate limits of the proliferative (Prol) and hypertrophic (Hyp) zones. Scale bar, 100 μm. (c) Growth-plate and proliferative-zone width (Prol Z width) were reduced in GHR–/– mice (open) versus wild-type littermates (filled); n = 8 per group. AP < 0.05, BP < 0.01, and CP < 0.001 vs. wild-type. (d) Total femoral BMD (left) in 16-week-old littermates in wild-type (filled), heterozygote (gray, GHR+/–), and knockout (open, GHR–/–) mice. Proximal femoral BMC (right) at 8, 16, and 24 weeks of age in wild-type (filled), GHR+/– (gray), and GHR–/– (open) mice (n = 8 per group). AP < 0.05 and BP < 0.0001 vs. wild-type; CP < 0.001 and DP < 0.01 vs. same transgene group at previous time point.

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts