Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

Differential Effects of Immunosuppressants on Lymphocyte Function
Alan Winkelstein
Alan Winkelstein
Published September 1, 1973
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1973;52(9):2293-2299. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI107417.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

Differential Effects of Immunosuppressants on Lymphocyte Function

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

In vitro and in vivo parameters of T lymphocyte function were evaluated in guinea pigs following treatment with the “cycle-active” drugs, 6-mercaptopurine (6MP) and methotrexate, and the “non-cycle-active” alkylating agent, cyclophosphamide. Commencing at the time of sensitization to tuberculin protein, animals were treated with an 8 day course of one of the cytotoxic drugs. This regimen either reduced or abolished the cutaneous response to PPD. The two cycle-active drugs inhibited the in vitro lymphoproliferative response to PPD and suppressed the elaboration of migration inhibition factor (MIF) by lymph node cells. However, these agents did not reduce blood lymphocytes, deplete the cellularity of the thymic dependent areas of peripheral tissues, or alter the in vitro response of lymph node cells to the nonspecific mitogen PHA. In contrast, treatment with cyclophosphamide was associated with a reduction in peripheral blood and tissue lymphocytes and impaired responses to PHA by residual lymph node cells. In vitro proliferative responses to PPD were inhibited but the capacity of lymph node cells to elaborate MIF was not suppressed. In addition to their effects on antigen-reactive lymphocytes, all three drugs significantly reduced the number of macrophages in induced peritoneal exudates. With respect to immunosuppressive activities, results of these investigations suggest that the noncycle-active agents affect both intermitotic and dividing T lymphocytes without impairing certain intermitotic functions of residual cells. The cycle-active drugs have a more restricted toxicity limited to those T lymphocytes which have been stimulated to undergo active DNA synthesis by antigenic challenge.

Authors

Alan Winkelstein

×

Usage data is cumulative from June 2024 through June 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 98 27
PDF 42 11
Scanned page 236 2
Citation downloads 43 0
Totals 419 40
Total Views 459
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts