Usage Information
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1973;52(7):1665-1672. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI107347.
Abstract
To characterize the biological changes which result in increased granulocyte alkaline p-nitrophenyl phosphatase activity in patients with polycythemia vera, the enzyme was purified from granule fractions of sucrose homogenates made from dextran-sedimented leukocytes of normal subjects and patients with polycythemia vera. Polycythemic blood yielded 3-10 times as much granulocyte alkaline phosphatase per 109 leukocytes as did normal blood. Sodium dodecyl sulfate extracts of granules were purified by DEAE-cellulose chromatography and sucrose gradient centrifugation to apparent homogeneity as judged by polycarylamide disk gel electrophoresis. Granulocyte alkaline phosphatase from normal subjects was purified 6910-fold with a 60% yield and a specific activity of 47 U/mg. Granulocyte alkaline phosphatase from polycythemic patients was purified 1.166-fold with a 50% yield and a specific activity of 70 U/mg. The two enzymes did not differ in molecular weight; both appeared to be about 160,000 daltons by sucrose gradient centrifugation. Both appeared to be zinc metalloenzymes, in that they were specifically inhibited by o-phenanthroline. Their elution requirements when adsorbed to DEAE-cellulose suggested they were lipoproteins although the content of phosphorus was below the threshold of detection. The identity of the two enzymes was suggested by immunological studies in which antibody prepared against purified polycythemia vera enzyme gave a precipitation reaction of identity with another polycythemia vera enzyme and two pools of normal enzyme. It is possible to account for the difference in alkaline phosphatase activity between the granulocytes of patients with polycythemia vera and normal subjects by differences in the quantity of enzyme synthesized.
Authors
Daniel Rosenblum, Shirley J. Petzold
Usage data is cumulative from August 2024 through August 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 163 | 26 |
| 70 | 9 | |
| Scanned page | 302 | 2 |
| Citation downloads | 61 | 0 |
| Totals | 596 | 37 |
| Total Views | 633 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)