In six normal upright subjects, a 100 mol bolus—composed of equal parts of neon, carbon monoxide, and acetylene (Ne, CO, and C2H2)—was inspired from either residual volume (RV) or functional residual capacity (FRC) during a slow inspiration from RV to total lung capacity (TLC). After breath holding and subsequent collection of the exhalate, diffusing capacity and pulmonary capillary blood flow per liter of lung volume (DL/VA and Q̇C/VA) were calculated from the rates of CO and C2H2 disappearances relative to Ne. The means: DL/VA = 5.26 ml/min × mm Hg per liter (bolus at RV), 6.54 ml/min × mm Hg per liter (at FRC); Q̇C/VA 0.537 liters/minute per liter (bolus at RV), 0.992 liters/minute per liter (at FRC). Similar maneuvers using Xenon-133 confirmed that, during inspiration, more of the bolus goes to the upper zone if introduced at RV and more to the lower, if at FRC. A lung model has been constructed which describes how DL/VA and Q̇C/VA must be distributed to satisfy the experimental data. According to this model, there is a steep gradient of Q̇C/VA, increasing from apex to base, similar to that previously determined by other techniques—and also a gradient in the same direction, although not as steep, for DL/VA. This more uniform distribution of DL/VA compared with Q̇C/VA indicates a vertical unevenness of diffusing capacity with respect to blood flow (DL/Q̇C). However, the relative degree of vertical unevenness of DL/VA compared with Q̇C/VA can account only in part for previous observations attributed to the inhomogeneity of DL/VA and Q̇C/VA. Thus, a more generalized unevennes of these ratios must exist throughout the lung, independent of gravitation.
Edward D. Michaelson, Marvin A. Sackner, Robert L. Johnson Jr.
Usage data is cumulative from December 2024 through December 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 140 | 6 |
| 70 | 7 | |
| Scanned page | 335 | 1 |
| Citation downloads | 70 | 0 |
| Totals | 615 | 14 |
| Total Views | 629 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.