Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Research Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI107149

Studies of Two Subpopulations of Human Lymphocytes Differing in Responsiveness to Concanavalin A

David Boldt, Sister Ann Marie Skinner, and Stuart Kornfeld

Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110

Department of Biochemistry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110

Find articles by Boldt, D. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110

Department of Biochemistry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110

Find articles by Skinner, S. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110

Department of Biochemistry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110

Find articles by Kornfeld, S. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published December 1, 1972 - More info

Published in Volume 51, Issue 12 on December 1, 1972
J Clin Invest. 1972;51(12):3225–3234. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI107149.
© 1972 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published December 1, 1972 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

We have identified two populations of human lymphocytes differing in responsiveness to the plant mitogen concanavalin A (Con-A). When peripheral blood lymphocytes are passed through a nylon column a population of lymphocytes highly responsive to Con-A adheres to the fibers while a second population of cells relatively unresponsive to Con-A emerges from the column. The untreated peripheral blood lymphocytes are termed “unfiltered” cells while the lymphocytes which pass through the column are termed “filtered” cells.

Under standard assay conditions the Con-A-stimulated DNA synthesis is 6.5-fold greater, and the percentage blast formation is four-to fivefold greater in the unfiltered than in the filtered population. Mixing unfiltered with filtered cells fails to induce responsiveness in the latter indicating that a “helper” cell is not involved. The failure of filtered cells to respond to Con-A is specific for that mitogen since both populations respond nearly equally to erythroagglutinating phytohemagglutinin (E-PHA) and the poke weed mitogen (PWM). Binding studies with Con-A-131I demonstrate that the unfiltered population possesses approximately three times as many Con-A receptor sites per cell as the filtered cells, although both cell populations bind the mitogen with the same affinity (apparent association constant [K] of 1.67 × 106m−1).

The relationship between Con-A binding and lymphocyte activation was determined by measuring the effect on DNA synthesis of incubating the two lymphocyte populations with increasing amounts of Con-A. The concentration of Con-A required for half-maximal stimulation of DNA synthesis was 5-14 times greater for the filtered cells. However in the presence of very high Con-A concentrations the filtered cells achieved a maximal rate of DNA synthesis approaching that of the unfiltered population. These data implicate the decreased number of Con-A receptor sites on the filtered cells in their failure to respond to low concentrations of Con-A. A crucial event in the activation of lymphocytes by plant mitogens may be the binding of a critical number of the mitogen molecules to the cell surface.

Browse pages

Click on an image below to see the page. View PDF of the complete article

icon of scanned page 3225
page 3225
icon of scanned page 3226
page 3226
icon of scanned page 3227
page 3227
icon of scanned page 3228
page 3228
icon of scanned page 3229
page 3229
icon of scanned page 3230
page 3230
icon of scanned page 3231
page 3231
icon of scanned page 3232
page 3232
icon of scanned page 3233
page 3233
icon of scanned page 3234
page 3234
Version history
  • Version 1 (December 1, 1972): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts