Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • The cGAS-STING pathway: DNA sensing in health and disease (Jun 2026)
    • Neurodegeneration (Mar 2026)
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

Studies on the Response of Patients with Classic Hemophilia to Transfusion with Concentrates of Antihemophilic Factor: A DIFFERENCE IN THE HALF-LIFE OF ANTIHEMOPHILIC FACTOR AS MEASURED BY PROCOAGULANT AND IMMUNOLOGIC TECHNIQUES
Bruce Bennett, Oscar D. Ratnoff
Bruce Bennett, Oscar D. Ratnoff
View: Text | PDF

Studies on the Response of Patients with Classic Hemophilia to Transfusion with Concentrates of Antihemophilic Factor: A DIFFERENCE IN THE HALF-LIFE OF ANTIHEMOPHILIC FACTOR AS MEASURED BY PROCOAGULANT AND IMMUNOLOGIC TECHNIQUES

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Antihemophilic factor (AHF, factor VIII) levels were measured by a standard coagulation method and by an immunologic technique before and after infusion of AHF concentrates into patients with classic hemophilia. After infusion of AHF concentrates, the half-life of the AHF procoagulant (i.e., clot-promoting) activity varied from 12 to 14 hr, whereas that of the antigen ranged from 24 to 40 hr. The half-life of the antigen was similar in patients with and without circulating anticoagulants to AHF. The data are compatible with the suggestion that the antigen may be carried on a precursor molecule which the patient with hemophilia produces but cannot convert to the functional clot-promoting agent. Other explanations of the observations are, however, recognized.

Authors

Bruce Bennett, Oscar D. Ratnoff

×

Usage data is cumulative from June 2025 through June 2026.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 214 3
PDF 107 4
Scanned page 207 4
Citation downloads 164 0
Totals 692 11
Total Views 703
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts