The effectiveness of the baroreceptor reflex in conscious dogs with experimental cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure was compared with that in a group of normal conscious dogs. Cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure were produced by tricuspid avulsion and progressive pulmonary stenosis. The sensitivity of the baroreceptor reflex to transient hypertension was assessed by determining the slope of the regression line relating the prolongation of the R-R interval to the rise in systolic arterial pressure during the transient elevation of arterial pressure induced by an intravenous injection of 1-phenylephrine. The mean slope averaged 22.4±2.3 msec/nm Hg in 16 normal animals. 23.1 ±1.5 in five sham-operated animals, and was significantly reduced to 8.3 ±0.8 in 10 dogs with hypertrophy alone (P < 0.001), and to 3.3±0.5 in nine dogs with heart failure (P < 0.001). The response to baroreceptor hypotension was compared during bilateral carotid artery occlusion (BCO) in six normal and six heart failure dogs previously instrumented with Doppler flow transducers on the superior mesenteric and renal arteries. During BCO, in normal dogs arterial pressure increased 52±4 mm Hg, heart rate 33±2 beats/min, mesenteric resistance 0.17±0.03 mm Hg/ml per min, and renal resistance 0.37±0.10 mm Hg/ml per min. In the heart failure group all of these variables increased significantly less (P < 0.01); arterial pressure rose 25 ±3 mm Hg, heart rate 13 ±4 beats/min, mesenteric resistance 0.04±0.007 mm Hg/ml per min, and renal resistance 0.18±0.09 mm Hg/ml per min.
Charles B. Higgins, Stephen F. Vatner, Dwain L. Eckberg, Eugene Braunwald
Usage data is cumulative from September 2023 through September 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 201 | 0 |
90 | 16 | |
Figure | 0 | 1 |
Scanned page | 348 | 9 |
Citation downloads | 49 | 0 |
Totals | 688 | 26 |
Total Views | 714 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.