Micropuncture studies have indicated that variation in peritubular oncotic pressure influences net transport of fluid out of the proximal tubule. The present in vitro studies on isolated perfused rabbit proximal convoluted tubules were designed to examine whether protein concentration gradient must act across the peritubular capillary membrane to influence reabsorption, or whether it can exert a direct effect across the tubular basement membrane 71 proximal tubules were perfused with ultrafiltrate made isosmolal to bathing fluids, the latter having identical electrolyte composition as the perfusing ultrafiltrate, but adjusted to three oncotic pressures: hypooncotic, protein 0.0 g/100 ml; control isooncotic serum, protein 6.4 g/100 ml; and hyperoncotic, protein 12.5 g/100 ml. Net volume flux (nl/mm per min), net Na flux (nEq/mm per min), unidirectional Na flux from bath to lumen (nEq/mm per min), and passive permeability coefficient (× 10-5 cm/sec) for Na (PNa), urea (Purea), and sucrose (Psucrose) were determined using isotopic techniques. When the bath was hypooncotic, there was (as compared with isooncotic serum) a significant decrease in net volume (38%) and net sodium (40%) flux, but no change in PNa, Purea, or transtubular potential; however, Psucrose increased significantly (78%). In experiments in which hyperoncotic bath was used, there was (compared with isooncotic serum) an increase in net volume (28%) and net sodium (30%) flux, but transtubular potential difference did not change significantly.
Masashi Imai, Juha P. Kokko
Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 116 | 8 |
43 | 7 | |
Scanned page | 482 | 5 |
Citation downloads | 51 | 0 |
Totals | 692 | 20 |
Total Views | 712 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.