The reabsorption of water and solute by the papillary collecting duct was studied during water diuresis and vasopressin-induced antidiuresis in young rats with hereditary hypothalamic diabetes insipidus. The tip of the left renal papilla was exposed and fluid was obtained by micropuncture from loops of Henle and from collecting ducts at the papillary tip, and at an average of 1 mm proximal to the tip. In water diuresis the ratio of tubule fluid to plasma (TF/P) osmolality (osm) of loop fluid was 1.73 ±0.058 (SE); of fluid from the proximal collecting duct, 0.63 ±0.027; and from the tip, 0.55 ±0.024; indicating a substantial osmotic pressure difference across the collecting duct epithelium. The fraction of filtered water reabsorbed (× 100) by the terminal collecting duct was 1.58% ±0.32. In antidiuresis the TF/P osm of loop fluid was 2.65 ±0.109; of fluid from the proximal collecting duct, 2.20 ±0.093; and from the tip, 2.71 ±0.111; indicating a marked decrease in the driving force for water reabsorption. The fraction of filtered water reabsorbed (× 100) by the terminal collecting duct was reduced to 0.58% ±0.08, while the delivery of solute to the same segment was unchanged from that in water diuresis. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of the right kidney declined from 327 ±24.4 μl/min in water diuresis to 274 ±24.4 μl/min in antidiuresis (P < 0.005); similar results were obtained in a study comparing right and left GFRs in five additional rats. Thus, fractional reabsorption (and very likely the absolute volume) of water reabsorbed by the terminal collecting duct was less in antidiuresis than in water diuresis (mean difference, 1.01% ±0.29, P < 0.005).
Rex L. Jamison, John Buerkert, Frank Lacy, Dan Marcus, Betty Henton
Usage data is cumulative from August 2024 through August 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 124 | 2 |
45 | 11 | |
Scanned page | 322 | 5 |
Citation downloads | 67 | 0 |
Totals | 558 | 18 |
Total Views | 576 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.