Usage Information

Association of autoantibodies to different nuclear antigens with clinical patterns of rheumatic disease and responsiveness to therapy
Gordon C. Sharp, … , A. D. Kaiser, Halsted R. Holman
Gordon C. Sharp, … , A. D. Kaiser, Halsted R. Holman
Published February 1, 1971
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1971;50(2):350-359. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI106502.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

Association of autoantibodies to different nuclear antigens with clinical patterns of rheumatic disease and responsiveness to therapy

Abstract

Using a hemagglutination test which can detect antibodies to (a) native and denatured deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and (b) an extractable nuclear antigen (ENA), a comparative study of patterns of autoantibody formation has been done in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and related rheumatic diseases. Antibody to native DNA was present in the serum in 96% of patients with active SLE and disappeared during remissions. Antibody to ENA was found in 86% of those patients with SLE nephritis who responded to treatment but in only 8% of those who did not. The highest titers of antibody to ENA were found in patients having a mixed connective tissue disease syndrome with features of SLE, scleroderma, and myositis. The latter syndrome was notable for the absence of renal disease and for a striking responsiveness to corticosteroid therapy. Hemagglutination testing of 277 sera from normal persons and patients with a wide variety of acute diseases other than SLE revealed the presence of antibody to native DNA in only 1.4% and antibody to ENA in only 0.4%.

Authors

Gordon C. Sharp, William S. Irvin, Robert L. LaRoque, Carmen Velez, Virginia Daly, A. D. Kaiser, Halsted R. Holman

×

Usage data is cumulative from June 2024 through June 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 206 5
PDF 42 18
Scanned page 365 8
Citation downloads 48 0
Totals 661 31
Total Views 692
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement