Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Research Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI106117

Studies on the role of angiotensin in experimental renovascular hypertension: an immunologic approach

A. R. Christlieb, T. U. L. Biber, and R. B. Hickler

1Hypertension Unit and the Department of Medicine, Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

Find articles by Christlieb, A. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Hypertension Unit and the Department of Medicine, Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

Find articles by Biber, T. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Hypertension Unit and the Department of Medicine, Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

Find articles by Hickler, R. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published August 1, 1969 - More info

Published in Volume 48, Issue 8 on August 1, 1969
J Clin Invest. 1969;48(8):1506–1518. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI106117.
© 1969 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published August 1, 1969 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

The role of angiotensin in three forms of experimental hypertension was assessed in rats. First, the acute blood pressure response to injected angiotensin amide and angiotensin acid was determined. Rats made hypertensive with deoxycorticosterone and saline showed exaggerated responses; rats made hypertensive by clipping one renal artery showed depressed responses; and rats made hypertensive by clipping one renal artery and contralateral nephrectomy showed normal responsivity to angiotensin amide but depressed responsivity to angiotensin acid. These findings suggested that different mechanisms may be involved in the three types of hypertension studied.

To assess the role of angiotensin in these hypertensive rats the blood pressure response, the presence of antibodies determined by radioimmune techniques, and the degree of refractoriness to injected angiotensin after immunization with angiotensin were studied. None of six rats made hypertensive by deoxycorticosterone and saline, and none of five mock immunized rats with renal hypertension of both types had a fall in blood pressure. By contrast, of the 20 rats with both types of renal hypertension in which antibody determinations were made, 11 had developed a significant antibody titer, of which seven showed a significant reduction in blood pressure at the time of antibody determination, and three of the remaining four had a significant blood pressure reduction earlier in their course. None of the nine renal hypertensive rats without demonstrable antibodies had a reduced blood pressure at the time of antibody determination, and only one had an earlier reduction in blood pressure. The renal hypertensive rats were all refractory to injected angiotensin after immunization.

These results suggest a primary role for angiotensin in both forms of renal hypertension.

Browse pages

Click on an image below to see the page. View PDF of the complete article

icon of scanned page 1506
page 1506
icon of scanned page 1507
page 1507
icon of scanned page 1508
page 1508
icon of scanned page 1509
page 1509
icon of scanned page 1510
page 1510
icon of scanned page 1511
page 1511
icon of scanned page 1512
page 1512
icon of scanned page 1513
page 1513
icon of scanned page 1514
page 1514
icon of scanned page 1515
page 1515
icon of scanned page 1516
page 1516
icon of scanned page 1517
page 1517
icon of scanned page 1518
page 1518
Version history
  • Version 1 (August 1, 1969): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts