Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Research Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI106073

Maximum expiratory flow rates in induced bronchoconstriction in man

A. Bouhuys, V. R. Hunt, B. M. Kim, and A. Zapletal

1John B. Pierce Foundation Laboratory and the Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510

Find articles by Bouhuys, A. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1John B. Pierce Foundation Laboratory and the Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510

Find articles by Hunt, V. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1John B. Pierce Foundation Laboratory and the Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510

Find articles by Kim, B. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1John B. Pierce Foundation Laboratory and the Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510

Find articles by Zapletal, A. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published June 1, 1969 - More info

Published in Volume 48, Issue 6 on June 1, 1969
J Clin Invest. 1969;48(6):1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI106073.
© 1969 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published June 1, 1969 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

We evaluated changes of maximum expiratory flow-volume (MEFV) curves and of partial expiratory flow-volume (PEFV) curves caused by bronchoconstrictor drugs and dust, and compared these to the reverse changes induced by a bronchodilator drug in previously bronchoconstricted subjects. Measurements of maximum flow at constant lung inflation (i.e. liters thoracic gas volume) showed larger changes, both after constriction and after dilation, than measurements of peak expiratory flow rate, 1 sec forced expiratory volume and the slope of the effort-independent portion of MEFV curves. Changes of flow rates on PEFV curves (made after inspiration to mid-vital capacity) were usually larger than those of flow rates on MEFV curves (made after inspiration to total lung capacity). The decreased maximum flow rates after constrictor agents are not caused by changes in lung static recoil force and are attributed to narrowing of small airways, i.e., airways which are uncompressed during forced expirations. Changes of maximum expiratory flow rates at constant lung inflation (e.g. 60% of the control total lung capacity) provide an objective and sensitive measurement of changes in airway caliber which remains valid if total lung capacity is altered during treatment.

Browse pages

Click on an image below to see the page. View PDF of the complete article

icon of scanned page 1159
page 1159
icon of scanned page 1160
page 1160
icon of scanned page 1161
page 1161
icon of scanned page 1162
page 1162
icon of scanned page 1163
page 1163
icon of scanned page 1164
page 1164
icon of scanned page 1165
page 1165
icon of scanned page 1166
page 1166
icon of scanned page 1167
page 1167
icon of scanned page 1168
page 1168
Version history
  • Version 1 (June 1, 1969): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts