The renal excretion of urobilinogen was studied in dogs by standard clearance techniques. The use of radiochemically pure tritiated mesobilirubinogen as a representative urobilinogen afforded much greater analytical precision than can be obtained with the usual colorimetric and fluorimetric techniques which are only semiquantitative. With constant plasma levels of urobilinogen, raising urinary pH from 5 to 8 increased urobilinogen excretion from about 30% to up to 200% of the filtered load. When urinary pH was kept constant, changes in blood pH had no effect on urobilinogen excretion. Increases in urinary flow had no effect on urobilinogen excretion when the urine was alkaline but increased excretion markedly during aciduria. Probenecid did not influence urobilinogen excretion by the kidney. It is concluded that urobilinogen is excreted by a three-component system of glomerular filtration, active secretion, and pH-dependent nonionic diffusion in the distal nephron. Urobilinogen is a weak acid, and this mode of excretion is similar to that of other weak, organic acids, such as salicylates. These results indicate that urinary pH and flow must be considered in the clinical interpretation of measurements of urinary urobilinogen.
Mortimer Levy, Roger Lester, Norman G. Levinsky
Usage data is cumulative from March 2023 through March 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 109 | 0 |
54 | 83 | |
Scanned page | 103 | 30 |
Citation downloads | 9 | 0 |
Totals | 275 | 113 |
Total Views | 388 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.