Two tests were used to differentiate abnormalities in release of platelet factor 3 (PF3) from quantitative deficiencies of this factor in normal subjects and in patients with renal failure. The first test was an assay which determined availability of PF3 (PF3-A time) and involved the use of a mixture of patient's platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and normal platelet-poor plasma (PPP) in a fixed ratio (1:8). The second test was similar but used “frozen and thawed” platelets to obtain a quantitative estimate of PF3 (PF3-F time). An abnormal PF3-A time was found in approximately three-quarters of 55 patients with renal insufficiency; 43 of these had chronic and 12 had acute renal failure. This abnormality was present both in patients with and without hemorrhagic manifestations, although it was slightly more common in bleeders. The PF3-F test was abnormal in approximately one-third of the bleeding patients and one-quarter of the non-bleeders. The PF3-A time returned to normal or was significantly shortened 24-48 hr after peritoneal or hemodialysis. Studies on patients who were not dialyzed showed no statistically significant correlations between the PF3-A time and either the serum urea nitrogen, creatinine, calcium, or phosphorus. Furthermore, the PF3-A time was not affected by guanidinosuccinic or guanidinoacetic acids. We therefore conclude that the demonstrable platelet abnormality in patients with uremia is produced by an unknown dialyzable material.
S. Frederick Rabiner, Otto Hrodek
Usage data is cumulative from August 2024 through August 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 162 | 28 |
56 | 15 | |
Figure | 0 | 5 |
Scanned page | 451 | 6 |
Citation downloads | 62 | 0 |
Totals | 731 | 54 |
Total Views | 785 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.