Using autologous 131I-fibrinogen, we made studies of the metabolism and distribution of fibrinogen in 10 patients with hemophilia A. In two patients simultaneous studies of autologous 131I-fibrinogen and homologous 125I-fibrinogen prepared from healthy donors' plasma were carried out. The average value for the plasma volume was 42.1 ± 8.8 ml/kg; for the plasma fibrinogen concentration, 349 ± 90 mg/100 ml; for the intravascular fibrinogen, 144 ± 32 mg/kg; for the interstitial fibrinogen, 30 ± 11 mg/kg; for the slower half-life of 131I-fibrinogen, 2.34 ± 0.17 days; for the transcapillary transfer rate of fibrinogen, 109 ± 37 mg/kg per day; and for the catabolic and synthetic rates of fibrinogen, 51.7 ± 13.1 mg/kg per day. Comparison of these results with those of the previous study in healthy male subjects showed that in patients with hemophilia A the catabolic and synthetic rates of fibrinogen are markedly increased, whereas the plasma fibrinogen concentration, intravascular and interstitial fibrinogen, and the transcapillary transfer rate of fibrinogen are not significantly different. The simultaneous studies of autologous 131I-fibrinogen and normal homologous 125I-fibrinogen in two subjects revealed that the two preparations behaved very similarly. Based on these findings, we concluded that our present findings are not due to the qualitative difference between the hemophilia A and normal fibrinogens, but that they are due to the difference in the host condition with respect to the fibrinogen metabolism, which is either an increased rate of direct breakdown of fibrinogen or an increased rate of fibrinogen breakdown after fibrin formation, or both.
Y. Takeda, Alan Y. Chen
Usage data is cumulative from July 2024 through July 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 98 | 8 |
48 | 8 | |
Scanned page | 255 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 71 | 0 |
Totals | 472 | 16 |
Total Views | 488 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.