Submit a comment
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical trials have suggested antitumor activity from PARP inhibition beyond homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). RNASEH2B loss is unrelated to HRD and preclinically sensitizes to PARP inhibition. The current study reports on RNASEH2B protein loss in advanced prostate cancer and its association with RB1 protein loss, clinical outcome, and clonal dynamics during treatment with PARP inhibition in a prospective clinical trial.METHODS Whole tumor biopsies from multiple cohorts of patients with advanced prostate cancer were interrogated using whole-exome sequencing (WES), RNA-Seq (bulk and single nucleus), and IHC for RNASEH2B and RB1. Biopsies from patients treated with olaparib in the TOPARP-A and TOPARP-B clinical trials were used to evaluate RNASEH2B clonal selection during olaparib treatment.RESULTS Shallow codeletion of RNASEH2B and adjacent RB1 — colocated at chromosome 13q14 — was common, deep codeletion infrequent, and gene loss associated with lower mRNA expression. In castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) biopsies, RNASEH2B and RB1 mRNA expression correlated, but single nucleus RNA-Seq indicated discordant loss of expression. IHC studies showed that loss of the 2 proteins often occurred independently, arguably due to stochastic second allele loss. Pre- and posttreatment metastatic CRPC (mCRPC) biopsy studies from BRCA1/2 WT tumors, treated on the TOPARP phase II trial, indicated that olaparib eradicated RNASEH2B-loss tumor subclones.CONCLUSION PARP inhibition may benefit men suffering from mCRPC by eradicating tumor subclones with RNASEH2B loss.TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01682772.FUNDING AstraZeneca; Cancer Research UK; Medical Research Council; Cancer Research UK; Prostate Cancer UK; Movember Foundation; Prostate Cancer Foundation.
Authors
Juliet Carmichael, Ines Figueiredo, Bora Gurel, Nick Beije, Wei Yuan, Jan Rekowski, George Seed, Suzanne Carreira, Claudia Bertan, Maria de Los Dolores Fenor de La Maza, Khobe Chandran, Antje Neeb, Jon Welti, Lewis Gallagher, Denisa Bogdan, Mateus Crespo, Ruth Riisnaes, Ana Ferreira, Susana Miranda, Jinqiu Lu, Michael M. Shen, Emma Hall, Nuria Porta, Daniel Westaby, Christina Guo, Rafael Grochot, Christopher J. Lord, Joaquin Mateo, Adam Sharp, Johann de Bono
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)