Advertisement
Salicylic acid: an old dog, new tricks, and staphylococcal disease
Mathias Herrmann
Department of Bacteriology and Hygiene, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany
Address correspondence to: Mathias Herrmann, Department of Bacteriology and Hygiene, Institute of Microbiology and Hygiene, Building 43, Kirrberger Street, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany. Phone: 49-6841-162-3900; Fax: 49-6841-162-3985; E-mail: mathias.herrmann@uniklinik-saarland.de.
Find articles by Herrmann, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar
Published July 15, 2003 - More info
J Clin Invest. 2003;112(2):149–151. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI19143.
© 2003 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
One hundred and twenty years after its initial description as the pathogen that causes sepsis and abscesses (1), Staphylococcus aureus remains a dangerous organism. Staphylococcal endocarditis is on the rise (2) and still causes significant mortality (3). The methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) epidemic has entered a new era due to the spread of MRSA into the community (4) and acquisition of new resistance cassettes with the potential for genetic transfer (5). The advent of fully vancomycin-resistant, methicillin-resistant clinical isolates (6) has further weakened the available armamentarium against this pathogen.
-
Distinctive effects of acetylsalicylic acid and salicylic acid on platelets and bacteria
A particular role of platelets in the pathogenesis of staphylococcal endocarditis has been suggested since the early observation by Durack of bacterial interaction with fibrin-platelet matrices at sites of nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis (15) and the series of reports by Clawson et al. on the interaction of S. aureus with purified platelets (16). In the early 1990s, experiments with surface-activated platelets suggested to our group the importance of fibrinogen and S. aureus clumping factor in the bacteria-platelet interaction (17). These observations were subsequently confirmed and extended by use of a low-platelet-binding mutant expressing a mutated ClfA protein (18) that displays diminished virulence in an endocarditis model (19), and by identification of the secreted fibrinogen-binding proteins Coa and Efb in phage-display panning assays (20) (Figure 1).
Figure 1Pathogenic events resulting in endovascular disease. Local inflammation activates the binding of fibronectin by ECs through vascular cell adhesion molecules; platelet activation is triggered by cytokines and tissue factor (TF) secreted by monocytes and ECs. Fibronectin also mediates invasion of ECs by S. aureus, allowing for persistence and intracellular growth shielded from host defense. The inflammatory response mediated by T cells and polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) may be mitigated by the effect of Eap (39, 40). MO, monocyte.
While these observations pointed toward complex but, according to their adhesive function, rather propathogenic events at the bacteria-endocardium interface, the role of platelets had to be reevaluated after the discovery that they function as specialized inflammatory cells (21) in response to secretion of antimicrobial peptides. In fact, paradoxically, hyperexpression of α-toxin by S. aureus results in diminished virulence in experimental endocarditis, possibly because of the release of platelet microbicidal proteins (22).
The attributed role of platelets in the disease process that results in endovascular infection has prompted a number of researchers to interfere with platelet function for prevention or treatment of endocarditis. Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) has been used in vitro and in a number of experimental models to reduce vegetation sizes and to mitigate the course of disease (23–25). Similar effects have also been observed by Kupferwasser et al. (26). However, when they studied its metabolite, salicylic acid (SAL), in parallel to ASA, they made the interesting observation that pretreatment of bacteria with SAL reduced attachment to the valvular epithelium to an even greater extent than administration of ASA. This observation was accompanied by the in vitro finding that SAL-pretreated S. aureus cells bound to a lesser degree to platelets and to fibrin-platelet and fibrin matrices than did untreated bacteria and elicited platelet aggregation in a prolonged reaction time. Since SAL lacks the key effect of ASA on platelet function consisting of acetylation of the platelet COX-1, the observed in vivo attenuation and in vitro adherence studies delineated distinct effects of ASA and SAL on platelets and microorganisms, respectively.
-
SAL modulates key regulatory steps in pathogenesis
In this issue of the JCI, Kupferwasser and colleagues (27) extend these exciting findings. In a careful approach using a number of strains with functional gene regulator deletions and complementations in various genetic backgrounds, they demonstrated an acid stress–independent, SAL-mediated activation of the alternative staphylococcal stress response gene sigB, and consequently a downregulation of the sarA and agr regulons with a concomitant decrease in the expression of hla and fnbA (Figure 2). These effects resulted in decreased bacterial adherence, and reduced toxin-mediated hemolysis and thrombolysis. Most importantly, SAL pretreatment attenuated the course of disease by decreasing the vegetation weight, the vegetation bacterial density, and the renal bacterial density.
Figure 2Potential roles of salicylic acid (SAL) in the pathogenesis of S. aureus endovascular infection. (I) SAL pretreatment of S. aureus results in overexpression of SigB-dependent genes in both an rsbU-positive and an rsbU-negative background, suggesting SigB activation independent of the anti–ς-factor RsbU. (II) Activation of the sarAP3 promotor appears to contribute to decreased expression of active SarA protein, putatively via inhibitory activity of the sarAP3 gene product. Again, SAL appears to contribute to SarA reduction in a sarAP3-additive fashion. (III) As SarA controls expression of RNAII and RNAIII, the net effect of SAL is a mitigation of the agr response. Since α-toxin (hla) expression depends on both sar and agr, and expression of wall-bound adhesins is also in part controlled by sar, the mitigation of both adhesin and toxin expression in SAL-treated microorganisms appears to depend on a combined sar/agr effect; yet other regulators may also be involved. (IV) In addition to hla, the expression of other secreted molecules such as the extracellular adhesive protein Eap depends on agr and sarA and may be downregulated under the influence of SAL. Expression of the polysaccharide intracellular adhesin (PIA) is suggested to depend on sigB, which may positively control expression of icaADBC, with consequences not yet fully understood in S. aureus endovascular infection. The S. aureus adhesins (FnBPA, FnBPB, ClfA, and ClfB) recognize fibronectin and fibrinogen, which are presented on ECs and platelets.
The role of sarA and agr in the course of experimental endocarditis has already been studied previously by this group (28). What is novel in this approach is delineation of the effect of SAL on the global regulators, which induces a downregulated status of functional sarA and agr. The nature of agr as a two-component signal transduction–dependent regulator may allow for autoinduction and bacterial interference (29). Another approach to the attenuation of virulence is inhibition of the electron transport (30) that drives microorganisms in a small-colony variant phenotype, as seen in a more chronic-persistent course of disease such as in cystic fibrosis (31). Yet, the establishing of a straightforward, unequivocal strategy to downregulate staphylococcal virulence using a cheap, simple, relatively nontoxic, resorbable compound such as SAL may be seen as major progress in the development of intervening strategies in addition to antimicrobial drugs.
Article tools
- Download citation information
- Send a comment
- Terms of use
- Standard abbreviations
- Need help? Email the journal
Metrics
Go to
- Top
- Abstract
- Importance of staphylococcal attachment and invasion in endovascular disease
- Distinctive effects of acetylsalicylic acid and salicylic acid on platelets and bacteria
- SAL modulates key regulatory steps in pathogenesis
- Potential directions of future research
- Acknowledgments
- Footnotes
- References
- Version history
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)