Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Nanoparticulate STING agonists are potent lymph node–targeted vaccine adjuvants
Melissa C. Hanson, … , Stefanie Mueller, Darrell J. Irvine
Melissa C. Hanson, … , Stefanie Mueller, Darrell J. Irvine
Published May 4, 2015
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2015;125(6):2532-2546. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI79915.
View: Text | PDF
Technical Advance Immunology

Nanoparticulate STING agonists are potent lymph node–targeted vaccine adjuvants

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Cyclic dinucleotides (CDNs) are agonists of stimulator of IFN genes (STING) and have potential as vaccine adjuvants. However, cyclic di-GMP (cdGMP) injected s.c. shows minimal uptake into lymphatics/draining lymph nodes (dLNs) and instead is rapidly distributed to the bloodstream, leading to systemic inflammation. Here, we encapsulated cdGMP within PEGylated lipid nanoparticles (NP-cdGMP) to redirect this adjuvant to dLNs. Compared with unformulated CDNs, encapsulation blocked systemic dissemination and markedly enhanced dLN accumulation in murine models. Delivery of NP-cdGMP increased CD8+ T cell responses primed by peptide vaccines and enhanced therapeutic antitumor immunity. A combination of a poorly immunogenic liposomal HIV gp41 peptide antigen and NP-cdGMP robustly induced type I IFN in dLNs, induced a greater expansion of vaccine-specific CD4+ T cells, and greatly increased germinal center B cell differentiation in dLNs compared with a combination of liposomal HIV gp41 and soluble CDN. Further, NP-cdGMP promoted durable antibody titers that were substantially higher than those promoted by the well-studied TLR agonist monophosphoryl lipid A and comparable to a much larger dose of unformulated cdGMP, without the systemic toxicity of the latter. These results demonstrate that nanoparticulate delivery safely targets CDNs to the dLNs and enhances the efficacy of this adjuvant. Moreover, this approach can be broadly applied to other small-molecule immunomodulators of interest for vaccines and immunotherapy.

Authors

Melissa C. Hanson, Monica P. Crespo, Wuhbet Abraham, Kelly D. Moynihan, Gregory L. Szeto, Stephanie H. Chen, Mariane B. Melo, Stefanie Mueller, Darrell J. Irvine

×

Figure 7

NP-cdGMP elicits durable class-switched humoral responses and synergizes with MPLA to adjuvant MPER vaccines.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
NP-cdGMP elicits durable class-switched humoral responses and synergizes...
(A–C) BALB/c mice were immunized on days 0, 21, and 42 with NP-MPER/HIV30 alone, NP-MPER/HIV30/MPLA, or NP-MPER/HIV30 plus cdGMP or NP-cdGMP. (A) Serum anti-MPER total IgG titers assessed via ELISA on days 49 and 138 (n = 3 per group). *P < 0.05, ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. (B) ELISA analysis of specific isotypes of serum anti-MPER Ig at day 49 (n = 3 per group). ****P < 0.0001, ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. (C) Percentages of PNA+GL-7+IgDloB220+ germinal center B cells (GCs) in dLNs at day 49 (n = 3 per group). *P < 0.05, ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Data from 1 representative of 2 independent experiments are shown. (D and E) BALB/c mice (n = 4 per group) were immunized on days 0, 21, and 42 with NP-MPER/HIV30/MPLA alone or additionally adjuvanted with cdGMP or NP-cdGMP. (D) Serum anti-MPER IgG titers over time and (E) specific isotype responses at day 49 assessed via ELISA. P < 0.0001, comparison of NP-MPER/MPLA vs. NP-MPER/MPLA + NP-cdGMP groups over time. P < 0.0001, comparison of NP-MPER/MPLA + soluble cdGMP vs. NP-MPER/MPLA + NP-cdGMP over time, ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001, ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Titer values in B and E show geometric mean and 96% confidence interval.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts