Usage Information

Neuropeptide signaling and hydrocephalus: SCO with the flow
David J. Picketts
David J. Picketts
View: Text | PDF
Commentary

Neuropeptide signaling and hydrocephalus: SCO with the flow

Abstract

Congenital hydrocephalus affects 0.1–0.3% of live births, with a high mortality rate (~50%) in the absence of surgical intervention. Although the insertion of shunts alleviates the symptoms of the majority of congenital cases, the molecular basis of hydrocephalus and the mechanisms of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation remain largely unknown. Two important players are the subcommissural organ/Reissner’s fiber (SCO/RF) complex and the ventricular ependymal (vel) cells that together facilitate the flow of the CSF through the narrow canals of the ventricular system. In this issue of the JCI, Lang et al. demonstrate that overexpression of the pituitary adenylate cyclase–activating polypeptide (PACAP) type I (PAC1) receptor gene results in abnormal development of the SCO and vel cells, leading to congenital hydrocephalus (see the related article beginning on page 1924). The ligand for the PAC1 receptor is the neuropeptide PACAP, which uncovers what the authors believe to be a novel role for this signaling cascade in the regulation of CSF circulation.

Authors

David J. Picketts

×

Usage data is cumulative from September 2025 through September 2026.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 443 10
PDF 198 3
Figure 467 0
Citation downloads 186 0
Totals 1,294 13
Total Views 1,307
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement