Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
The Splice Index as a prognostic biomarker of strength and function in myotonic dystrophy type 1
Marina Provenzano, Kobe Ikegami, Kameron Bates, Alison Gaynor, Julia M. Hartman, Aileen Jones, Amanda Butler, Kiera N. Berggren, Jeanne Dekdebrun, Man Hung, Dana M. Lapato, Michael Kiefer, Charles A. Thornton, Nicholas E. Johnson, Melissa A. Hale, on behalf of the Myotonic Dystrophy Clinical Research Network (DMCRN)
Marina Provenzano, Kobe Ikegami, Kameron Bates, Alison Gaynor, Julia M. Hartman, Aileen Jones, Amanda Butler, Kiera N. Berggren, Jeanne Dekdebrun, Man Hung, Dana M. Lapato, Michael Kiefer, Charles A. Thornton, Nicholas E. Johnson, Melissa A. Hale, on behalf of the Myotonic Dystrophy Clinical Research Network (DMCRN)
View: Text | PDF
Clinical Research and Public Health Muscle biology

The Splice Index as a prognostic biomarker of strength and function in myotonic dystrophy type 1

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

BACKGROUND Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is a multisystemic, CTG repeat expansion disorder characterized by a slow, progressive decline in skeletal muscle function. A biomarker correlating RNA mis-splicing, the core pathogenic disease mechanism, and muscle performance is crucial for assessing response to disease-modifying interventions. We evaluated the Myotonic Dystrophy Splice Index (SI), a composite RNA splicing biomarker incorporating 22 disease-specific events, as a potential biomarker of DM1 muscle weakness.METHODS Total RNA sequencing of tibialis anterior biopsies from 58 DM1 participants and 33 unaffected/disease controls was used to evaluate RNA splicing events across the disease spectrum. Targeted RNA sequencing was used to derive the SI from biopsies collected at baseline (n = 52) or a 3-month (n = 37) follow-up visit along with clinical measures of muscle performance.RESULTS The SI demonstrated significant associations with measures of muscle strength and ambulation, including ankle dorsiflexion (ADF) strength and 10-meter run/fast walk (Pearson’s r = –0.719 and –0.680, respectively). The SI was relatively stable over 3 months (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.863). Latent-class analysis identified 3 DM1 subgroups stratified by baseline SI (SIMild, SIModerate, and SISevere); SIModerate individuals had a significant increase in the SI over 3 months. Multiple linear regression modeling revealed that baseline ADF and SI were predictive of strength at 3 months (adjusted R² = 0.830).CONCLUSION The SI is a reliable biomarker that captures associations of RNA mis-splicing with physical strength and mobility and has prognostic utility to predict future function, establishing it as a potential biomarker for assessment of therapeutic target engagement.TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03981575.FUNDING FDA (7R01FD006071), Myotonic Dystrophy Foundation, Wyck Foundation, Muscular Dystrophy Association, Novartis, Dyne, Avidity, PepGen, Takeda, Sanofi Genzyme, Pfizer, Arthex, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals.

Authors

Marina Provenzano, Kobe Ikegami, Kameron Bates, Alison Gaynor, Julia M. Hartman, Aileen Jones, Amanda Butler, Kiera N. Berggren, Jeanne Dekdebrun, Man Hung, Dana M. Lapato, Michael Kiefer, Charles A. Thornton, Nicholas E. Johnson, Melissa A. Hale, on behalf of the Myotonic Dystrophy Clinical Research Network (DMCRN)

×

Figure 4

Mean Splice Index increases between baseline and 3 months in longitudinal DM1 cohort, with no changes in functional endpoints.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Mean Splice Index increases between baseline and 3 months in longitudina...
(A and B) Assessment of changes in ankle dorsiflexion (ADF) strength in longitudinal DM1 cohort. (A) Comparison of baseline (BL) and 3-month (3M) ADF demonstrates strong test-retest reliability between time points. Line of agreement (x = y) is displayed and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% CI is reported. (B) Mean ADF strength is unchanged in longitudinal DM1 cohort at BL and 3M (n = 34). (C and D) BL (C) and 3M (D) Splice Index (SI) scores correlate strongly with time point–matched measures of ADF strength (n = 34). BL SI vs. BL ADF Pearson’s r = –0.723 [–0.852, –0.507] and 3M SI vs. 3M ADF Pearson’s r = –0.717 [–0.849, –0.499]. (E and F) Assessment of changes in 10-meter run/fast walk (10MRW) speed in longitudinal DM1 cohort. (E) Comparison of BL and 3M 10MRW speed demonstrates strong test-retest reliability (F) and no mean difference between time points (n = 32). (G and H) BL (G) and 3M (H) SI scores correlate strongly with time point–matched measures of 10MRW speed. BL SI vs. BL 10MRW, n = 34, Pearson’s r = –0.725 [–0.854, –0.513] and 3M SI vs. 3M 10MRW, n = 32, Pearson’s r = –0.700 [–0.843 –0.465]. (I and J) Assessment of changes in SI score over 3M in longitudinal DM1 cohort. (I) SI demonstrates moderate test-retest reliability (J), but a significant increase in mean SI score (n = 35). (K) Bland-Altman plot illustrating agreement between SI scores at BL and 3M in longitudinal subcohort. Dotted lines represent mean of the differences (bias) and 95% limits of agreement (mean of differences ± 1.96 SD). Data in B, F, and J are presented as mean ± SD and were analyzed with a paired, 2-tailed t test. ***P < 0.001. NS, not significant. All correlations reported as Pearson’s r [95% CI] with 2-tailed P values.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts